Congress has rarely been very popular, but since the Republicans won control of the House in 2010, Congress’ job approval rating has fluctuated between being very low and reaching new historic lows. Now, according to Gallup, its job approval rating has again dropped and is tied with an all time low of just 10 percent approval. From Gallup:

This all makes it very hard to understand why Mitt Romney thought it would be a good idea to choose a running mate who is a leader in Congress. I thought one of the few good arguments Romney had going for himself was plausible deniability for being responsible for the most unpopular recent Republican actions. After all, Romney didn’t serve in the Bush administration, so he can distance himself from its unpopularity, nor did Romney serve in Congress, which should have allowed him to distance himself from it as well. He could at least claim to be untainted.
Yet choosing Rep. Paul Ryan Romney has ruined this advantage. Not only has Romney tied himself to an historically unpopular Congress, but he has directly tied himself to the architect of one of the most unpopular things Republicans have done during this Congress, which is to push for a plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program.
Ryan is not particular popular or well known outside the chattering class. He doesn’t bring an important swing state or swing voting bloc. While VP picks have only a small impact in elections, I fail to see what real benefits Ryan adds thatmake up for throwing away what I previously thought was one of Romney’s biggest strengths.



22 Comments
Pleasing voters no longer matters, Paul Ryan is to bring Koch Brothers money.
Some years ago I read of a study that showed that, despite the overall disgust with Congress, a large percentage of people thought that their Congressperson was o.k. Go figger.
That’s true. More than ever, this election will hinge on voter supression and the vagaries of computer chips.
catch22oy,
It’s due to voters blaming “the other guy” for the problems of the country.
The surveys typically ask what you think of Congress and very generalized questions. When you ask voters about THEIR representatives, the numbers change dramatically.
Given the approval rating of Congress you have to ask how ANY incumbent in any part of the country would be favored.
Just waiting for the Democrats patented “grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory” ploy.
“While VP picks have only a small impact in elections…”
one wouldn’t know that given the orgy now issuing from self-described “progressive” supporters of our regressive murderer-in-chief, Barack Obama.
But, you’ll have to remember that candidates have been bought since they were alder-persons(?) The choices presented to the voters have been bred for years to ignore the people.
I think Mitt’s first choice for VP would have been someone like Rob Portman or Tim Pawlenty. Unfortunately for Mittens, I believe someone else forced him into this choice.
If you conclude that Romney and his VP were specifically selected to lose, and to ensure that Obama wins, everything Romney represents, does and says, makes sense.
Obama has been so crappy, such a complete dissapointment, that any half assed Republican candidate might well win. That can’t be allowed to happen.
From the perspective of the top group, what wouldn’t they like about another four years of Obama?
Nothing. They will get everything they want, from Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and their partners in the Republican party.
But wouldn’t you want another 4 years with a Nobel Peace Prize winner? Tom Lehrer, the wonderful satirist, decided that, after Kissinger won one, that irony was dead.
Voter Suppression full speed ahead! Ryan who?
I was baffled as well. It was like Romney only campaigns for the 1%. Trying to forge his own reality within a tunnel.
Was Ryan picked b/c Mitt’s likability numbers are awful? Right now at least you would think Ryan was at the top slot as everyone is slicing and dicing his Unicorn Budget wetdream
Thanks, needed the chuckle.
It also explains why Obama didn’t help in the 2010 elections. He wanted a strong opposition, otherwise, how could he pull off the things he did? He needed at least one of the senate or house to be Republican.
Although they still had the 60 vote rule to fall back on.
what a complete farce.
If “they” want Obama to win, why are “they” giving money to Romney at a ratio of 4 or 7 to 1?
You would think that “they” would want to double down on Obama and put all “their” cash at the Congressional Level.
Obama has governed as a NeoCon, much more Conservative than Bush, since he offloaded the burden of all those pie in the sky Progressives who rode his coat tails in 2008 with the ass whipping of 2010.
A Democrat with Republican collusion could pull off an NDAA, gut air quality regs, more wars against more countries that Bush couldn’t get awaay with without the teeming millions howling.
Could you imagine the hue and cry if Bush had let the banks off scott free like Obama has? Obama extended and amplified the attacks on state run medical MJ, drilling in the Arctic. All the various broken promises
No one has raised a peep against Obama’s Center Right pivot. I imagine the Bushies are way envious of Obama’s inevitable raising of SS to 70 and Medicare to 67.
Imagine the horrors to come in GWB’s 4th term!
I agree. I can’t explain that. If it’s true.
but, I read/was told that most of Obama’s money last time round came from small donors. That turned out to be untrue.
so who knows.
There you go.
It excited the big right wing moneybags who might be willing to fork over ever more dough.
As mafir says, they got what they wanted out of obama, and then some.
While they might be pushing mitt this go around, what do they have to lose?
If someone gave me 100% and the other guy says I’ll give you 110%, why not back the other guy? If the other guy loses I still will get my 100%.
It’s a win-win and a feast of riches anyway you slice it for them.
No, you just misunderstood. They meant “small”, under 5 ft 6 in. All those banksters are short little dweebs with Napoleon complexes.
You get no argument from me. But, the filthy rich and filthier richer don;t like to throw good money after bad. Romney is behind and it doesn’t look like he has a chance to win in the electoral college no matter what. Did you see how fast Gingrich’s “sugar daddy” disappeared as soon as Newt was statistically out of the race.
Indeed. For the 1% it’s a choIce between two doors……
Door# 1 is a NEW CAR!!! Door# 2 is a NEW CAR AND NEW BOAT!!!!!
The hurrahs of Very Serious People? ™
-stewartm