Only weeks, if not days, away from Mitt Romney announcing his pick for the running mate, several prominent conservatives are pushing very hard for Rep. Paul Ryan. Just today the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Rich Lowry of the National Review joined the chorus in favor of Romney.
From the Wall Street Journal’s “Why Not Paul Ryan?”:
The whispering over Mitt Romney’s choice of a running mate is getting louder, and along with it we are being treated to the sotto voce angst of the GOP establishment: Whatever else Mitt does, he wouldn’t dare pick Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan, would he?
Too risky, goes the Beltway chorus. His selection would make Medicare and the House budget the issue, not the economy. The 42-year-old is too young, too wonky, too, you know, serious. Beneath it all you can hear the murmurs of the ultimate Washington insult—that Mr. Ryan is too dangerous because he thinks politics is about things that matter. That dude really believes in something, and we certainly can’t have that.
All of which highly recommend him for the job.
From Rich Lowry writing at Politico “Don’t Fear Ryan“:
That the hyper-cautious Romney is seriously considering him counts as one of the biggest surprises of a campaign almost entirely lacking in them. Picking Ryan would represent a Romney revolt against conventional wisdom. And appropriately so — since the conventional wisdom is wrong.
[...]
Romney has other worthy VP options that don’t provoke such agita. Overly safe is its own risk, though. Tim Pawlenty would offend no one, but might create a VP letdown in the party. Rob Portman is highly capable but is a former Bush official at a time when the Obama campaign is eager to define Romney as Bush redux.
Ryan would inject a jolt of energy into the campaign and reorient the debate around policy. The Romney campaign doesn’t have to be reckless. It does have to have a pulse. It doesn’t have to commit ideological hari-kari. It does have to have an unmistakable substantive content.
Ryan is the unusual potential choice that would probably make both conservatives and liberals equally happy for basically the same reason. So far Romney has run his campaign remarkably devoid of policy details and real vision, picking Ryan would change that. On big issues Ryan has stated a clear, very conservative vision for how he wants to remake the nation.
Conservatives think if this vision is put to voters in the right way it will win, giving them the “mandate” to move the nation heavily rightward. Liberals are equally convinced that if Ryan’s ideas are put before the electorate, they will be rejected overwhelmingly. Romney choosing Ryan as his running mate would put both positions to the test to see which is correct. At the very least it would inject some substance into an election which has been focused on tax returns, trying to guess what Romney means from his incredibly vague policy statements, and highly deceptive editing of Obama’s statements.




33 Comments
The right wing sets a very low bar for “intellectual” status. Ryan has an undergraduate degree from Miami of Ohio; worked for the family business after graduating (a “marketing consultant” for a site-work construction company? Please.); and then worked as a staffer for a variety of GOP officeholders before attracting enough right-wing cash to win a seat in Congress.
Yeah, Ryan stands on an intellectual par with the likes of Joseph Stiglitz.
It doesn’t matter. Romney is going to lose. He’s that terrible a candidate.
The Romney campaign has already proven adept in making its case to the voters in the only way I think Ryan can be successfully sold: by lying and avoiding specifics.
Ryan’s $350 a bottle wine imported from FRANCE
They would claim that mandate anyway. They always do.
A little birdie told me Dr*dge is pushing for Betrayus. I wouldn’t go onsite to check it out, though.
Liberals should not be complacent about a Ryan nomination. With heavy advertising and the strong turnout the vote by the Ryanites, he could puy Romney over the top. C onventional democratic belief that the unthinkable is unelectable is fa big reasonwhy we are where we are today. It’s magical thinking.
He is another Koch Brother approved lackey.
So if Ryan gets picked, does that mean we will have a debate between Romney and Obama over the best way to cut social security?
Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.blog on NY Times just published yesterday a new analysis of what VP picks would have the most positive impact on Romney’s chances of winning the election. The top two choices are Portman of Ohio and McDonnell of Virginia. In both of those cases, a swing state that is currently leaning toward Obama could swing into Romney’s column.
Ryan’s popularity in Wisconsin outside his home district is even weaker than Rubio’s in Florida and he would not be a good choice in terms of delivering his home state.
Rubio’s popularity in Florida isn’t that strong. There is only a slim chance that he could win the state for Romney. Some choices (like Jindal in Louisiana) come from states that are already strongly backing Romney. Interestingly, Santorum and Pawlenty are very unpopular in their home states and would only hurt Romney’s chances.
Hey WSJ: How much time you got?
The Zombie-Eyed Granny-Starver’s (thanks, Charlie Pierce) bribe list can be found here. This list does not include all that off-the-radar, Citizen’s United cash, of course.
Prolly unkind of me to say this, but Ryan always has that goofy “What, me worry” smirk on his face. (No offense meant to Alfred E. Neuman, of course.)
I forgot to add (see #10): Ryan’s popularity in Wisconsin outside his home district is not strong. He would be an even weaker choice than Rubio in terms of delivering his home state for Romney.
Ryan’s budget would make the Catfood Commission’s recommendations look utterly profligate by comparison. Ryan and his acolytes are very bad news.
I don;t think even Romney is stupid enough to pick this guy.
He’s a dimwit, dipshit, and a dickhead.
Ryan would make Dan Quayle’s chouce look like a brilliant move, politically. Ryan HAS opinions and strategies. Totally incompatible with Romney’s, “Trust me,I’ll do the right thing. I just can’t tell you what that is.”
May I say, you are generally “on point”. I’m not sure “getting help” from his VP chouce is an option. “Least damage” could be.
I think you know my pick is Rubio. But, I think Romney will probably pick somebody else ‘cuz he’s not as smart as me. Then again, the party may tell him who to pick. Or the Koch brothers. Or Ann.
Funny how Obama claimed the same mandate after the last election….
Knut: I agree with you. The right is willing to put up idealogically pure candidates at the risk of loosing an election because if they win, they win big. If you don’t read what the right bloggers are saying you don’t know how popular Ryan is on the right.
Also the fact that he voices his position and proposes budgets and laws that agree with it, is refreshing to some swing voters who may not totally agree with it. They would rather have someone with strong principles rather than a democrat who does not take a strong stand for fear of loosing the “middle”.
For some reason the left fail time after time to learn this lesson. Until the left learns to win primaries and be willing to loose the final election they will never beable to get their policies in place. They need to scare the main stream democrats the way the right has scared the main stream republicans. When a Richard Luger looses, every body moves right.
WE WANT SARAH! WE WANT SARAH! USA! USA! ;)~
Ryan’s pizza-making experience makes him uniquely qualified, other than Joe Walsh and his child-support experience that is, to manage trillions of dollars and the dismemberment of Medicare and Social Security. His lipless grin and lifeless gaze work well with Romney’s Christopher Lee Dracula eyes, and would be only a heartbeat away from a Koch presidency. For the most gullible among us, who stand on the principles of the atheist Ayn Rand, they make a good pair and would most certainly appeal to the mores of our numerous midwestern christians. A Mormon and an ‘catholic’ atheist. A gay hater and an elder abuser. Most excellent choice. Most visionary.
Or the post in my back yard, upon which sits a birdhouse.
Taking a cue from history, I’m putting my money on Rafalca as Mitt’s VP.
The last 3 are ideal qualifications to Republicans.
He had a mandate, he didn’t claim it. Wouldn’t have been “bipartisan.”
Ryan’s one of America’s eternal politicians. He’s also a jerk.
I have a son that had worked at the Janesville Country Club where Ryan is a member. He says that Paul Ryan walks around the club like a king and expects to be treated like one.
Says that Mrs. Ryan is even worse than her husband at the club. I suppose I shouldn’t say anything about Mrs. Ryan. You know keep family members out of the discussion. However I guess it’s okay to attack my family members by gutting social security and medicare.
Screw you Eddie Munster!
It is perfectly human to be offended by this purchase, but there may be a Krugman-friendly consequence here.
An unusual amount has unexpectedly been removed from stagnant savings and wended it’s way back into economic activity where it belongs. Even the UPS driver got a penny or two.
If Ryan had gotten a notion any of that might have had a positive result anywhere, he would have thought twice and bought a cheap Bordeaux instead.
Lasa Vegas oddmakers have Rubio favorite at 3/1, Portman at 5/1 and Ryan at 10/1 along with Pawlenty.
You may be right about Mrs. Ryan. But, admittedly, she married a dimwit, dipshit, and a dickhead. Doesn’t speak well for her, regardless.
Didn’t Lowery say that he thought Paul was winking at him?
Time to revive those social securities pledges!
Regarding Rubio.
Good looking, young, can talk up a blue streak, a snake.
The Repubs might think he is going to solve their Hispanic vote problem but I heard a guy on the radio today from Florida and his wife and family are Hispanic and he said they don’t like Cubans and consider them white.
Anyone else???
Wrong. Romney knows he’d have to be the ass end.
It’s understandable. Not only are Cuban-Americans automatic right wing by virtue of being anti-Castro, but they enjoy automatic special citizenry status just by the same virtue. So except for skin tint and a few great cultural quirks, they are white.
Puerto Rican-Americans can be excused for their automatic citizenry status because they paid for it through the Spanish-American war and are still discriminated against.
And I’m an asshole for making generalizations like this, just like anyone who thinks all Hispanic people are of one big Latino-mind unable to think for themselves. The fact is, if you want Hispanics to vote for you, you gotta have policies that meet their needs, and appeal to them one-by-one like every non-Hispanic. If Romney can’t do that, nothing’s going to save him from the consequences, much less a “correct” VP.