Despite the Obama campaign’s recent hammering of Mitt Romney for his role at Bain Capital, the vast majority of Americans still see his business experience there as a net positive for Romney, according to a new national USA Today/Gallup poll. From USA Today:
By more than 2-1, 63%-29%, those surveyed say Romney’s background in business, including his tenure at the private equity firm Bain Capital, would cause him to make good decisions, not bad ones, in dealing with the nation’s economic problems over the next four years.
The findings raise questions about Obama’s strategy of targeting Bain’s record in outsourcing jobs and hammering Romney for refusing to commit to releasing more than two years of his tax returns. Instead, Americans seem focused on the economy, where disappointment with the fragile recovery and the 8.2% unemployment rate are costing the president.
While it appears the attacks regarding Bain Capital haven’t yet done much national damage to Mr. Romney, we are still far out from the election, and most of the attack ads are focused on only key markets in swing states. What is more important than the message reaching a national audience is that it is working with targeted swing voters. The Pro-Obama Super PAC, Priorities USA claims they have poll which shows that it is.
The main reason the Obama campaign is going after Romney on Bain Capital is that Romney’s perceived competence on the economy is basically his only big selling point to swing voters. While it is obviously tough to attack someone on their supposed strength, if the Obama campaign can succeed it would be significant. We will need more time to see if the strategy eventual pays off, but the Obama team is clearly betting it will.



51 Comments
Probably just because I’m an immature kid…
That evoked sexual imagery in my head that I never wanted to subject myself to.
Now I’ve subjected all of you to it :(
Karl Rove found this easy peasy.
Should we even bother paying attention to this meaningless “horse race”? I think Snooki’s pregnancy makes more of a difference in our lives than two competing, pathological liars with the same agenda, despite some differences in rhetoric.
Katie and Tom’s divorce certainly makes more of a difference in our lives.
The prols will vote for their own destruction.
And they are to be blamed. Only people who are supremely ignorant would vote for a man who spent his life borrowing other people’s money to raid companies, steal their pensions, send as many jobs overseas as possible, then stash his wealth overseas so as not to pay into the federal treasury and think he is going to be good for them.
They deserve what they are going to get. Total impoverishment.
Too bad the rest of us are going down too.
Obama’s tag line in Ohio: “He’s not the solution, he’s part of the problem” runs after the Bain attack script and after the tax haven attack script. It seems to be making even my conservative neighbor think.
However, Rmoney’s attack on Obama re: Job numbers is just as effective.
It says a lot about how weak Obama is when you see how well Rmoney is doing. That man shouldn’t be much beyond a blip in the polls.
Boxturtle (Still thinks the election will be decided by the price of gas)
Mitt Romney
Believe in America
But stash your money offshore
Should make your neighbor think too.
Don’t forget, the bachlorette got engaged. Whomever she is.
Boxturtle (PROUD to admit I’ve never watched the show!)
As painful as it was to watch the primaries it still seemed to draw a crowd, maybe like a bad accident, but still. The upcoming debates should clearly spell out the difference between an intelligent speaker and what is essentially a potato.
I don’t know who that is either. Yay us!
It should. But his position is that Obama does it too, just that Obama is less successful and so has less money.
I get a better result when I ask him what he thinks Mitt will do. Dead silence, with a perplexed/fearful look on his face.
Boxturtle (Could probably get the same result asking the question about Obama)
I watched a video on CSPAN yesterday of Romney in 2000.
He was either on cocaine or has terminal diarrhea of the mouth. A lot of the same expressions he uses today. And man could he talk fast.
USA Today? There is nothing to read there. Isn’t the USA Today that thing left in front of your motel door to wipe up your dirty stuff?
The idiot prols are voting against the “socialist” black man.
The capitalist white man is going to grid them up even faster.
RMoney is going to lose in November. That’s already been decided. If the PTB weren’t happy with OilBomber they would’ve run a stronger R Candidate.
Ask him what he doesn’t understand about how Romney “made” his money.
Which part?
The borrowing other people’s money?
The laying off workers or moving the jobs overseas?
The raiding of the pensions?
Which part is going to be good for his (your neighbors) income and bank account?
Agreed.
I guess people think they have a fighting chance of becoming Mitt Romney.
Maybe, maybe not.
But TPTB made a big mistake letting Romney become the Republican candidate.
You can only rub peoples’ noses in the shit of the rich so much before they start hating the smell of them.
They are much more concerned about Obama bringing back a welfare state, raising taxes on everything to fund it (Especially income tax and gas tax) and coddling illegal immigrants.
Boxturtle (Children, this is what happens when you watch nothing but Fox)
Who was it that said Americans never embraced socialism because they all believe they’re just temporarily embarrassed millionaires?
I’m using campaign contributions as the measure of who PTB have determined is tto be next POTUS. R pulling ahead fast in recent months.
There weren’t any stronger R candidates. They tried everyone under the sun. Herman Cain????!!!!
Real millionaires feel no shame. That’s what separates them from the masses.
Obama.
Boxturtle (*rim shot*)
If we’re using campaign contributions, that’s a tough gauge. I recall reading last week that OilBomber has received more money from the big banks than RMoney.
I think there are a couple of viable, not crazier than a shithouse rat, Republicans out there at the state levels. They don’t get much press because they don’t spout wingnut bullshit. But to win this country you have to win independents, especially now that the independents are growing and tend to be centrists. I don’t think RMoney has a very good change with them.
We need to capitalize on TPTB’s mistake running Romney.
It is a perfect opportunity to heat up the class war with an oh so easy target.
Reading Yergin’s The Prize.
Rockefeller, a dedicated Baptist, was completely flummoxed why anyone should have any problems with Standard Oil, which was just business.
When is the R freedom porn nominating convention, anyway? I can’t wait./s
I gather that the data on campaign contributions lag by a lot. I kept asking for totals a week or so ago, and someone finally linked me to 5/31 and undated tabulations.
Other than that it seems to be random headlines at month end, which reflect partial data.
Somewhere I read a report of a study that indicated that empathy decreases as income rises. I believe that is probably true.
Hope you’re right, but they’re no happier with Obama. The RNC ads in Ohio says “Obama has had his chance and proved he’s not up to the job. Time for a change”.
They’re right, but Mitt is NOT a change for the better.
Boxturtle (What have we done to so anger the Gods that they inflict those two upon us?)
Kris makes a good point about who is contributing rather than just how much. Obviously small contributions would be essentially irrelevant. I wonder if there is a historical correlation between the contributions of certain industries or entities and winning presidents. If so, follow that money to the real leadership of the country.
I wonder how reliable any measure of ‘empathy’ would be to do a decent study.
Regardless, anecdotes do illustrate that Mitt’s attitude is not at all unique.
Well how many millionaires could be bothered to be interviewed about their level of empathy, really? Still, it’s a bit of trivia that’s stiuck with me.
I’m not sure a historic picture would help. Citizens United changed the game considerably. We don’t have much data to draw from in looking at past correlations.
There was a big hubbub a few months back about a book? or article? that posited most CEOs and big business MOTUs are probably sociopaths. I can’t recall what type of publication it was, otherwise I’d be able to eGooglize it better. Not finding what I’m looking for…
I was about to mention CU, however I’m not sure it changes the game as much as in amplifies the historical dynamic of buying winners.
The fault, dear BoxTurtle is not in our “stars” …
It is, simply, in ourselves … that not enough of us have said … “This is monumental Bull Shit, the whole, entire two-party ‘political’ thing, it is kabuki and simply the modern equivalent of ‘circuses’.”
None of us may imagine that this “thing”. left to itself, will right itself, may we?
None of us may pretend that good shall “triumph” when “lesser evil”, as both partisan groups consider AND defend their “champions”, is held to be “sufficient”.
The entire “lesser evil” meme is semantic evasion.
And semantic evasion shall not now, nor ever, save civil society, the rule of law, democracy … or the human species.
Semantic evasion merely allows us to lie to ourselves and each other, rationalizing our “conviction” that we have no other choices … and absolving ourselves of responsibility.
DW
I thought circuses were the modern equivalent of circuses. I took my kids to Ringling Bros. Barnum and Bailey last year…
/s
Hi DWB!
G’morning, Kris.
Think of “circus” as mass spectacle, in the old Roman sense, its purpose being to bemuse, befuddle, and convince the many that “understanding” is both “beyond” them and best left in the hands, invisible or otherwise, of their “betters”.
The old, “run … around”, if you will.
;~DW
What did you do, granddad, when the USA was collapsing?
I voted for lesser evil!
Just when you thought things couldn’t get worse, Keiser report on RT-tv speculates that he is Geithner’s successor.
TBogg, a big fan of the Cherry-Pick Mitt Romney Movement, seems to think this approach will be wildly successful. His clairvoyant friend Nate Silver predicts a great Obama victory, so that justifies it.
http://my.firedoglake.com/cassiodorus/2012/07/17/the-cherry-pick-mitt-romney-movement-marches-onward/
Precisely.
Don’t forget, they have no conscience either.
THAT’S the key!
That’s only true if you round to the nearest billion$$
Being a multi-millionaire means never having to say you’re sorry. :)
Who woulda thought that out of that plethora of candidates, the repugs couldn’t find just ONE that wasn’t batshit crazy???
Of course, being batshit crazy is one major aspect of being a republican in the first place. I suppose that’s where the fallacy lies.
Makes one wonder about the presence of a supreme being(s)
I read that too.
Didn’t surprise me. I’m in Houston, Enron, Stanford Financial, just to name a few.
Nope. Romney will win as long as he stays in the White race. He obviously hasn’t even had to play the Southern Stategy card yet. He can afford to let it stay under the table in case he needs it. Which he may never. (Although I do not believe his “Vote for the other guy if you want more free stuff” was just an innocent slip of his stupidity.)
I live in MA, the state reputed to be the “most liberal”, and I cannot spend a day out in public without some asshole I don’t even know whispering a racist joke or remark on Obama. They just normally trust me to go along because everyone White is trusted to think White. Apparently they never run into anyone else who doesn’t.
I voted for Cynthia McKinney in 08 and will vote for Jill Stein in 12. But I just think Obama should be taken out for failing to even try on his campaign promises. Who gives a shit what color he is. Besides everyone, that is.