With Republicans across the country pushing new photo ID requirements to vote this November, the Brennan Center for Justice has put out a new report that highlights the problems many low income Americans could face simply trying to obtain an ID to exercise their right to vote.
While some of these states technically offer some form of free photo ID to individuals, getting the documents you need to get the required ID will still cost money. According to the report, the cost of getting a birth certificate ranges between $8 to $25 (courts have struck down explicit poll taxes less than $5, but the Supreme Court has upheld a voter ID law).
And even if you have the necessary documentation and can pay these fees, getting to a government office can still be difficult for working people and those without cars. From the report:
The 11 percent of eligible voters who lack the required photo ID must travel to a designated government office to obtain one. Yet many citizens will have trouble making this trip. In the 10 states with restrictive voter ID laws:
- Nearly 500,000 eligible voters do not have access to a vehicle and live more than 10 miles from the nearest state ID-issuing office. Many of them live in rural areas with dwindling public transportation options.
- More than 10 million eligible voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest state ID-issuing office.
- 1.2 million eligible black voters and 500,000 eligible Hispanic voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office. People of color are more likely to be disenfranchised by these laws since they are less likely to have photo ID than the general population.
- Many ID-issuing offices maintain limited business hours. For example, the office in Sauk City, Wisconsin is open only on the fifth Wednesday of any month. But only four months in 2012 — February, May, August, and October — have five Wednesdays. In other states — Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Texas — many part-time ID-issuing offices are in the rural regions with the highest concentrations of people of color and people in poverty.
While most of the rest of the first world is moving towards facilitating enfranchisement, the United States is moving in the opposite direction, particularly in states controlled by the GOP. Voter ID laws are only the latest efforts to reduce the number of minorities and others who vote. Previously there were poll taxes and literacy tests during Jim Crow. More recently the drug war has done an incredible job of disproportionally turning minorities into felons, which becomes justification for denying them the right to vote.
At least part of the problem is that United States is one of the only democracies that doesn’t explicitly guarantee its citizens a right to vote in its Constitution. It lists reasons why voting can’t be denied — race, sex, — but the courts still let states claim there are other legitimate reasons why voting can be restricted. That has only encouraged politicians to find new official justifications for restricting eligibility.



32 Comments
I think this is a huge and serious problem, but the official line of the D party and D party stooges like Nate Silver is “Who cares?”
There was a diary at a well-known D website the other day assuring everyone that the suppression we paranoids are raving about is really not a big deal at all – won’t cost D’s more than 1.5% of the vote, according to Silver. So we should all just shut up and let them worry about it. What could go wrong?
One hurdle is one hurdle too many. So what can be done to get everybody properly registered and id’d? Mr Holder…? Your move. League of Women Voters and NOW? Please. The rest of us? Drive a neighbor.
HOpe we don;t have to reply on Mr. Holder. I think he’s on vacation. Has been for 3 1/2 years.
This would be amongst the reasons to be against austerity/tax cuts so that services can be funded and new services added. Having things like a birth certificate should be required, just what should be done is to make them free/affordable to obtain.
Having things like a birth certificate should be required
Please. Why should a birth certificate be required? A lot of people never had them, and most married women have a different name on their B.C. than on their D.L. Should they have to bring in their marriage license(s), too?
If you don’t have to show a birth certificate to pay income tax, why should you have to show a birth certificate to vote?
A copy of your own birth certificate should be free or maybe one dollar and you should be able to get it with no hassle.
Your right. All these groups need to step up and so do we.
All pups.
All kossacks.
etc. etc. etc.
In every one of these states with new voter id laws, we need to act. Netroots must occupy the vote.
NOW!
It should be but sadly it’s not. Some of the new voter id laws have made even the process of getting the id more onerous.
Actually here in Texas, it costs $4.00.
OTOH, you can get a copy of anybody’s birth certificate. Or, shall we say, several people’s. If you wish.
hint, hint, nod, nod.
Vote early and vote often.
Voter fraud happens mainly by conservatives/”Republicans.”
Vote suppression happens mainly to leftwingers/”Democrats.”
It’s completely wrong and should be stopped, yet I seriously doubt that any so-called “Democratic”
stoogepoliticians will do a damn thing about it. So that tells you all you need to know.OTOH, I think voting, anymore, is pretty useless due to vote rigging. The 1% decides who’s going to win in many cases, esp the POTUS.
However at state and local levels, I feel that votes count, or at least tend to count more. Voter IDs that are too constraining are wrong.
AS I said yesterday, I agree with you. POTUS election purely academic. OTOH, the $2 BILLIONthat will be spent this time around is good for the economy.
LOcal elections still can turn on 100-200 votes. WE got rid of a crooked, cronyistic U.s.rep in my old district with just 17 votes last time around.
I’ll take your word for it that D’s are taking this stand, and say to them (if they’re listening) you should be standing up for the right to vote as a matter of principle and a matter of law, not as a matter of calculating what percent of the vote you may lose.
In 2012 if you are too lazy to get yourself government issued identification than you shouldn’t be voting anyway.
Yeah, isn’t it cool! I am now also “Tonto Goldstein”.
“That has only encouraged politicians to find new official justifications for restricting eligibility.”
As much as I despise their agenda, I must give the GOP credit for their persistence and dedication to getting what they want. Democrats could learn a thing or two. They won’t, but they could.
In 2012 one either believes in the right to vote, for which people in this country and around the world have fought and died, or one doesn’t.
Congratulations!!!
ncg, aka Ramon Venezuela and Rajesh Patel.
I believe as you do.
OTOH, my understanding of the GOP’s position limits that “privilege” to ONLY those who agree with them politically. AS anyone else is patently wrong, disallusioned or misinformed, especially people of color, they shouldn’e be allowed to vote in America.
Nice try. Do you believe in poll taxes, as well?
Yes, it’s different when voting in state and local elections, which is really where mostly Democratic voter suppression occurs through unnecessary and/or constraining Voter IDs. The POTUS election is just a Kabuki Show, but OTOH, voters should not have any constraints to voting in that, either.
Anyone who thinks the having or not having of Voter IDs is about being too lazy has clearly been heavily propogandized by Rush & Fox. ptoui! That’s just wrong.
It’s not just the costs involved. When there is only one place in the entire county to get a driver license or state photo ID, and that place isn’t even near the center of the country and is only open from 9-4, M-F (like where I live), then it becomes very difficult to get such an ID without taking a day off work yourself and having someone drive you there.
A voter registration card with a signature should be enough.
Read my post #21.
lets all agree that requiring a valid State photo ID in order to Vote is not a good idea, even if you believe illegals are voting, because they can still vote absentee if you don’t have a photo ID.
So it doesn’t solve the problem.
The best way to solve that problem is for the Federal Government to provide the States with a valid voter database that they can use to purge their State databases.
Now for the people that say:
“hey, it’s just too hard for some people to get a photo ID”
I agree, but let’s do something about that!
We need to help these people get a valid photo ID, because it’s a major handicap to live in this Country without a photo ID.
Link for quote
Summary of study
PDF study
“Why should a birth certificate be required?”
Because only citizens can vote, it’s not like some British college student in the US should be able to vote in elections for fun.
“If you don’t have to show a birth certificate to pay income tax, why should you have to show a birth certificate to vote?”
Actually this gets right to the matter – not everyone who pays taxes can vote, while conversely not everyone who doesn’t pay taxes can’t vote. Taxation and citizenship are two different things. That British student that I mentioned above would be paying US taxes if they had a campus job, but that taxation gives them absolutely no entitlement to vote in a US election.
Link:
December 2011
I absolutely believe you have a right to vote if you can prove who you say you are.
Poll taxes? You want to compare making an appointment at the DMV with poll taxes? You’re delusional.
like I said. If you can’t be bothered to get an identification card in 2012 then you don’t deserve to vote.
If you believe in the right to vote, you should also believe in the system of voter registration and identification that has enabled citizens to vote and has served our country well in the past.
The purpose of voter ID laws is not to prevent voter fraud, because there is no voter fraud (see @24 and @26
The purpose is to make it difficult, expensive, and in some cases impossible for some citizens to vote. But I’m sure you know this.
I think we should make it as difficult as possible for people in Republican areas to register, we should short-change Republican leaning precincts when voting machines are distributed, we should look at the names in Republican-leaning areas and remove from the rolls anyone who has the same or vaguely similar name to one in a federal listing of felons from all 50 states. That is what Republicans are doing, except replace the word “Republican” with “Democrat.”
Given that this will be a very close (and actually meaningless) election, it doesn’t take much to tip the balance. Republicans believe in winning by whatever means they can–however unethical and unfair. Maybe we should require people to pass a science test to be able to vote. Republicans would throw shit fits about that!
Really? You must have no idea what it is like to be poor in this country. Let me give you an example. During Katrina 10% of the population of New Orleans did not evacuate because 25% of the population had no car. This also means they probably don’t have a driver’s license. Fast forward to today. Now, these same people who have no driver’s license have to figure out how to get one. The first thing they have to do is take a day off of work. The second thing they have to do is get to the DMV. The third thing they have to do is bring the proper ID to get the proper ID. And the proper ID can be a moving target.
So, you see, you are fucked if you are poor and suddenly have to remedy your voting status.
Just as an aside, over 1000 people died during Katrina in New Orleans because they had no access to transportation. Now their surviving relatives have to find transportation to gain an ID to vote.