Things appear to be looking up for Senate Democrats. While this year will be inherently very tough for Senate Democrats — they have 23 seats to defend compared to the Republicans who have only 10 seats up this year — the Democrats recently received several pieces of good news. Earlier this year there seemed to be a very good chance Republicans could take over the chamber, but recently that has begun to seem a more remote possibility.
In Montana, which should be one of the closest Senate races this year, new polling from PPP has incumbent Democrat Jon Tester with a lead for the first time in months. From PPP:
PPP’s first three polls on the Montana Senate race found the same thing every time: a 2 point lead for Denny Rehberg. Over the last six months though there’s been a shift and Jon Tester now leads Rehberg by a 48-43 margin.
Tester’s moved into the lead because of shifts with Democrats and independents. What was an 86-10 lead with Democrats is now 90-7. He’s been able to consolidate his base some. And although he already led independents by a 46-41 margin he’s pushed that advantage up further to 48-36.
Early this year, Indiana was assumed to be a safe hold for Republicans. But thanks to a bitter Republican primary, Democrats might have a shot at winning the seat. Polling shows incumbent Republican Dick Lugar could lose next week’s primary to State Treasurer Richard Mourdock. While Democrat Joe Donnelly would have a very tough time beating Lugar in the general, what little polling there is of the state shows he is competitive against Mourdock.
The retirement of Maine Republican senator Olympia Snowe two months ago moved what was a likely Republican hold to a likely Democratic pick up. Independent Angus King is currently seen as the overwhelming front runner. While he has not said which party he will caucus with, it is assumed he is more likely to side with the Democrats.
In Florida incumbent Democrat Bill Nelson is still polling well despite poor job approval numbers, because the GOP failed to recruit any top tier candidates. Florida could have been a real opportunity for Republicans, but they appear to have blown it. From PPP:
Nelson is up 47-37 on Connie Mack IV, 47-35 on Mike McCalister, and 48-34 on George LeMieux. Nelson’s advantage comes thanks to leads ranging from 24-33 points with independents over the Republican field and because he wins anywhere between 11 and 16% of the GOP vote in the three match ups, more than the share of the Democratic vote that he’s losing.
Nelson’s leads come despite having only a 36% approval rating, with 32% of voters disapproving of him. Even after decades at the center of Florida politics 33% have no opinion about him one way or the other. The main thing holding Nelson’s approval numbers back is that only 55% of Democrats give him good marks, but 80-81% of them still vote for him in head to head match ups against his GOP opponents. His 15% support from Republicans and 37/34 split with independents are decent.
In addition to the improving news for Senate Democrats at the state level, President Obama’s job approval numbers in April were the highest they have been in a year. Obama potentially doing better in the general should have some trickle down effect on lower ballot races.
Since the Senate playing field this year so strongly favors the Republican party, it is going to be extremely tough for Democrats to prevent losses in the Senate. But now the possibility of Democrats holding the chamber seems higher than it has been for most of the past two years.



53 Comments
In Indiana, Donnelly is a Blue Dog DINO. Mourdock is a Tea Party fave. I don’t think it matters whether we elect Lugar or Donnelly, frankly.
I think voters have favored bi-party government for decades and given the political environment and the record of same party majorities, especially (emphatically) recently, it’s the best voters can make of the candidates presented to them. I’m with Glenn Greenwald: McCain was tactically the better choice because he would have been something of an offset to the mindless tribalism of the Democrats after 2008. I’m probably playing this election that way.
I’m hearing that Democrats are privately complaining about Obama and the admin’s agenda. But nobody seems to have the spine to stand up in public. I just had an exchange with a Pelosi cheerleader at DKos who thinks Nancy is wonderful. The woman has several times and very recently stated her preference for austerity policy and Simpson-Bowles benefit cuts and the fool jumps in to tell me how great she is and what a hash the Senate made of her gutty legislative victories for single payer and immigration reform and I forget what-all else. Back in the day, I thought highly of her, myself, but my opinions move as evidence presents itself and Nancy doesn’t appear an effective liberal anymore. In fact, I’m wondering if all those liberal wish list House bills were just a deal between the House and Senate to let the House look liberal while the Senate took care of reactionary business.
Hey, I used to defend Bill Clinton, so I guess I should be more tolerant of Johnson’s triumph of hope over experience, but, damn, it’s hard to see how anyone with a modicum of common sense and an adult’s grip on reality could see Democrats as part of the solution. Democrats are the Ginger Rogers of the American political scene: the Republicans lead and the Democrats follow, backwards and in heels. No disrespect to the real Ginger Rogers, believe me.
So the Democrats cling to 51+ votes in the organizing resolution, keep that superhero Harry Reid as majority leader, then can’t even manage to get a simple majority vote for any bill due to defections by blue dogs and the filibuster remains firmly in place to prevent anything from getting done unless it gives Republicans exactly what they want.
Sounds like a big win! USA! USA! USA!
So? We will continue to have war without end, no jobs, no recovery, no civil rights, no constitution. The current state of affairs was brought to us by people named McCaskill, Nelson x 2, Lieberman, (party of one,please) Manchin, Bacchus, Conrad, Reid blah blah blah. When your own team is crazy, does bat shit crazy really look different?
Excellent post. I agree 100%. The democrats ARE part of the problem. The republicans are doing just what they have always been doing, representing themselves and the 1%. The problem is the democrats are not doing what they used to do, stick up for the little guy. “The People’s Party” of FDR and Truman, and JFK, JBJ and HHH has become a shell of what is once was and just another shill for the wealthy and the corporations. Mostly due to campaign finance shenanigans. In addition to be useless, they are clueless. We have one party that won;t govern and one that can’t. I wouldn’t give our troubles to a monkey ona a rock.
I’m not sure I can name another legislaturd, in my lifetime, that was more useless than Harry Reid. The entoire democratic senate needs to grow a pair or 51.
I don’t think Pelosi was ever a “librul” or err,ah, progressive.
These folks just adopt the label cuz it gives ‘em a constituency who they can cajole & exploit for political power.
Essentially,it just doesn’t seem to me that folks who are wealthy beyond belief will support the agenda of the poor.They will conform on some social issues but look the other way when “finance” is on the horizon.
So almost all of the congresscreeps who are wealthy folks really don’t give 0ne iota about the average American,they will say they do but it ain’t so.
Dude, you been kind absent for a while??
Since the Democrats have spent the last four years telling us that it takes 60 votes to do anything in the Senate, I find it hard to care whether they wind up with 51 or 48.
Or 46….or 44. Actually, they nmight be more powerful in the minority in that they could then “block” stuff. Better a hockey goalie than a hockey puck.
If you read Tom Ferguson’s Legislators Never Bowl Alone: Big Money, Mass Media, and the Polarization of Congress, http://www.nextnewdeal.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/bwpaper_ferguson_040811.pdf, you’ll have every historical fact to explain the circumstances we’re currently wallowing in. Speakers and majority and minority leaders and important committee chairs are for sale, openly. The price to play is posted and everyone knows what it costs to get whatever position s/he aspires to. Pelosi, Boehner, Reid, Hoyer, Cantor, and the chairs of desirable committees paid for those positions. When you see who occupies the big Congressional posts, you see the top money raisers. And the Democrats set that ball rolling decades ago when they changed the leadership rules to get rid of seniority, because the Southern Dixiecrat barons who stayed in office for decades were immovably entrenched in the leadership spots and couldn’t be shifted.
Now, now.
It’s pretty much guaranteed that the voters in Miramar, FL will vote against Bill “Katherine Harris” Nelson. Both he and Wasserman-Schultz are supporting the establishment of a private “immigrant detention facility” in that area. They have revealed themselves as corporate puppets and disregarded the demands of the local constituency.
Needs more horse-race bell.
Correct. It’s just a mask they wear while doing the bidding of their corporate masters. It is effective Kabuki, nonetheless, for the willfully ignorant.
> I don’t think Pelosi was ever a “librul” or err,ah, progressive.
Soon Nancy SMASH Social Security and Medicare.
No, I don;t mean it that way, just mean “not here”. You know, I’m the one in charge of taking roll.
Yes, and when the Democrats regain solid majorities in both the house and the senate, they’ll be able to accomplish so many good things that those mean old Republicans in the house have kept them from doing over the last two years, bla bla bla. Heard it all before.
Wasserman-Schultz is a creep.
All right…NOw THAT was funny!
Oh, OK. Mark me present, will you.
She also ushered in the total AIPAC monopoly on congressional leadership seats. Her dad was a supporter of Rabbi kook, the guy who started the Irgun (his intentions for saving jews by challenging Roosevelt and the jewish committees supported immigration quotas was admirable, but his racial superiority notions and terrorism in Israel was not)
“Present” and NOT a Wasserman-Shultz fan. GOT IT.
It was, indeed, funny. I needed that. :)
That really needs to be shouted from the roof tops with links and stuff.
Harry Reid has huge balls. That’s why he shuffles everywhere he goes.
They are not sissies, but machiavellian. if you want to understand how he operates read powwow’s diaries and comments.
it isn’t just the senators you mention. Whenever they pass bills against our civil liberties, a majority of dimocrats are voting for it. Besides the fact they have so-called progressives like Amy Klobucher author bills like SOPA and putting the radiation machines in the airports, voting for NDAA, voting for all the war funding, signing on to an attack on Iran, in AIPACS pocket and most rank and file Dims have no clue she is even doing it.
“She” being Pelosi? Who is Rabbi kook? I get the creeps when Jewish racial identity is raised. It sounds so Aryan race-like.
Amy Klobuchar is progressive like I’m wealthy. I wish! The woman is a one person fifth column.
That’s Corporate Puppet Creep. Please use her full title.
Forgive me.
Saw it covered on “The Young Turks” on Current TV the other night. Every once in a while Cenk falls into objectivity and actually questions the actions of the “Democrats”, though his lack of knowledge doesn’t allow that to last.
Okay, just don’t let it happen again or she might submit your name for a drone attack from her idol Obama.
Thank you!. Nice to be appreciated. I don’t get any at home. Appreciateion that is.
..
..
Well, honeslty, not the other either.
And…careful. My nephew is in the army and he says those things are so quiet you never hear ‘em coming.
That’s some interesting reading. Thanks for that. Inquiring minds want to know.
In the foreseeable future, that won’t be a joke. Drones are here, there are military agencies working on plans for domestic deployment–crowd control, don’t you know–and Obama has asserted the presidential prerogative to assassinate, murder, really, anyone, anywhere. With luck, when the strike happens, someone(s) who supported the program will get taken out, too. Live by the drone, die by the drone.
And anyone who thinks, or just hasn’t thought, at all, that other agencies and groups can’t produce and deploy drones in American air space is living in Neverland. The Church tried to forbid the crossbow in its time. Cat’s among the pigeons now.
Oh!I been so busy & my laptop was acting up.
Acting up how? Computer tech and just curious.
Well, racialism is complicated issue to deal with.
They called themselves the Bergsom group here in the US because they were controversial in Israel and it saved their families some embarrassment.
Rabbi Hillel Kook took the pseudonym Peter Bergsom, an associate and inspiration to Rabbi Charles Kahane, also a frequent guest in Kahane’s parents home.
One of the Bergson Group’s major supporters was Baltimore Mayor Thomas D’Alessandro, the father of current House Minority leader and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. FDR followed the lead of American reform Jews.
Forward: “Pelosi’s Price is right for the Jewish Community”
She kept her promise, and she kept him out of the lead seat of Means and Ways committee which he had earned through seniority.
It’s just her family history, but continuation of it short changes everyone and undermines our democracy. Who is she to act as gatekeeper? Also, Pelosi’s dad was a crook.
Jeebus H hockey sticks. That is what I am talking about! How can someone claim to be a Democrat and then support the concept of detaining for profit the innocents caught in the ICE web. Makes me crazy. And of course because we have no press here news in Miramar does not make it to Orlando, news in Orlando does not go any where else. Thanks for delivery the news that the paper is not interested in.
Agreed, but I think the foreseeable future is already upon us. James Cameron introduced killer drones in the series ‘Dark Angel” years ago.
Kahane I’m familiar with. How was Pelosi’s dad a crook? Can be said of many politicians. Israel has become the tail that wags the American dog: foreign and domestic affairs.
Fiction is one thing, material reality is another. Drone use in this country is underway.
The (s)elected corporate puppet representatives utilize the “R” and “D” labels to distract the people from the fact that they do the bidding of their masters, and create a divisive landscape that pits us against one another. It enhances their ability to anally rape the 99% for the benefit of the oligarchs.
Brought to us by the Puppet-in-Chief with a “D” next to his name.
The Price Is Right article is from 2006. The leadership positions are gatekeeper positions, that’s how Congress works. Used to be seniority, now it’s money raised. Congressional leaders positions have more power, more concentrated, than ever before. Within their domains, they’re absolute dictators. You can plainly see how they’ve used their powers to advance the causes of common people. Strengthen the economy. Ensure the rule of law. Impressive, isn’t it, all that public service, commonweal fervor.
It’s OK now thanks…..
It’s not even Israel that wagging the dog. It’s AIPAC who’s wagging Israel too.
How was her dad a crook? Even Wiki hides it. (like they do on kahane’s page by referring to his aka- Peter Bergsom, not Kook)
on the wiki page
Dominic Piracci was his Father in law. Pelosi’s Grandfather. The obstruction of Justice kept D’Alesandro out of trouble but he increased construction projects and handed no-bid contracts to Piracci, who gave him kickbacks.
Piracci received federal contracts to build post offices and such, but he managed get small penalties when he got busted. The trouble he was already in before was for paying off a union leader so he wouldn’t have to farm out to union subcontractors He got 6 months and Iozzi got 15 years. Then he got a pardon.
Rules were bent in his favor-recieving lucrative contracts throught the GSA that he should have been excluded from.
Her dad got busted for taking bribes but Attorney General John N. Mitchell made the trial secret or maybe the evidence. I can’t find the link.
Anyway, at her dad side is where Pelosi learned how to be a machine boss and own her power.
http://www2.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=13916
http://govinthenews.info/?p=66
An Independant is winning in Maine? Booyah! It would be nice if we could get Bernie some company.
As for Nelson and Tester……meh I could care less if they get re elected.
Pelosi strikes me as an old fashioned pol, to the bone. A political commentator described her as having no policy chops: his remark was that after five minutes of conversation, you exhausted her knowledge of any policy subject. I thought at the time that he might be just an old boys club dog, but now I’m thinking he might have been correct. Her recent remarks about austerity and Simpson-Bowles lead me to think that she’s setting up for an Obama style betrayal. Austerity and social benefit cuts.
Her brother was involved in Baltimore politics, as well.
We’ll live, we’ll see, but this doesn’t look good.
And you’re right about AIPAC, but it’s even more complicated than that. I read an article by an Israeli that described Sheldon Adelson as enormously feared by anyone who isn’t rabidly right wing Zionist. People of large reputation in the political and intellectual communities are afraid of him. He’s become a menace in Israel–which is sort of funny, in a savage way, an American harassing Israelis. He owns at least one news outlet there and he USES it.
I gather from remarks made by people who know them they are Republidems.