Supporters of the new Affordable Care Act have recently launched the “Thanks Obamacare!” campaign to highlight the law’s positive aspects.
For the most part I agree with what Jonathan Cohn told Sarah Kliff about the political thinking behind this effort
The New Republic’s Jonathan Cohn has stood out as a strong backer of the law who embraces the term openly, and has supported the president doing so as well. I e-mailed him this morning to ask him to explain his word choice. The question, he wrote back, is a “political” one.
“It seems to me that Obama is going to be associated with this law, for better or worse, come November,” Cohn continues. “Even if he wants to play it down, his critics will play it up. Given that, I assume he’s better off embracing that association — and reminding people what’s good about the law. He’s been doing a lot of that lately, as I imagine you’ve noticed.”
Obamacare is going to be talked about during the campaign. Obama can’t hide from it, so he might as well try to make it more popular.
Interestingly, several of the elements singled out for praise in this pro-ACA campaign messaging again demonstrate the almost unimaginable level of political malpractice the Obama administration committed in shaping the law.
Of the 10 things we should be “thanking” Obamacare for, five of them won’t really take effect until well after the 2012 election. We are supposed to thank the law for things it hasn’t actually done yet and won’t do until 2014. People simply aren’t going to be thankful for something that hasn’t happened yet.
It didn’t need to be this way. The Democrats could have started all or a large portion of the coverage expansion, such as the Medicaid expansion, before 2012. That at least would have produced several million people who could be genuinely thankful for the help they actually received. And it would have extended helpful relief to states burdened with Medicaid spending while the economy was still in a serious downturn. Instead the administration made the politically insane decision to focus on getting an arbitrary CBO score. As a result the law will provide very little direct benefit to people until at least 2014, after the 2012 election.
The only way to get people to be thankful for a law is not to run a messaging campaign telling them how it may possibly help them several years from now, but instead to have it actually help them now, when it matters.
Delaying the expansion of coverage until after not one, but two federal elections should be remembered as one of most idiotic political mistakes made by a major political party in decades.



54 Comments
I think Obama got exactly the kind of bill he wanted in ACA. Complete sellout to entrenched corporate interests by an IRS enforced individual mandate, check. Punch the dirty hippies by moving the reconciliation goalposts again and again by having DINO enablers like Nelson and Lieberman say no to Public Option and Medicare Buy-in, check. A final Fuck You to the middle class by not allowing full enactment until 2014, two years after the 2012 election, check.
From FDR and LBJ’s political spectrum, Jon, you’re right, this bill was horrible politics. But once you realize that Obama isn’t working for the 99%, it looks great.
more people would thank him if he didn’t use the republican bill and instead used the progressive model that works
Then it’s a good thing it wasn’t done sooner, since it’s a PoS.
According to this article, Russ Feingold also said the ACA is what Obama wanted:
Thank you, Obamacare, for forcing all Americans to purchase a very poorly regulated product that doesn’t even have antitrust regulations to prevent them from colluding to price fix the industry — AND for setting a dark precedent that would mandate people to purchase products from industries that have tons of politicians from both parties in their pockets, at their beck and call.
Leaving out the public option, and buying “yes” votes on Capitol Hill, and excessive waivers by HHS, and payoffs to big pharma are also among the many errors.
Many of ACA’s bon bons can be selectively resurrected after all its rungs are knocked out.
The Medicaid expansion should have started within 60 days of the bill passing.
When Obama ran in 2008 he:
1) promised to negotiate lower Rx prices (on TV!)
2) a public option
3) opposed an individual mandate.
Now we’re supposed to look back and wish ACA took effect sooner because it would have helped Obama? Don’t think so.
Ugh sorry about that, HERE is the article.
Oh, I’m thankful Obama stuck a knife in my back on Obamacare and am looking forward with humility to another round of kicks on the face when we have to bail out the crooked banks AGAIN.
Yea for Obama!
Not to worry. The wizards og Madison Avenue will make everyone believe that “everything is beeyoutaful” when they weave their spell on a gullible public.
An accurate analogy doesn’t immediately come to mind, but an imperfect one might be: we’ll let jay walkers off without a ticket if we can charge everyone a thousand dollar fine in the future for refusing to bow & scrape to the preznit.
BTW, how do you know that the Medicaid expansion will, like, ya know, ever occur? Just bc it’s (LOL) law doesn’t mean it will actually happen.
obama had the political capital to give us Medicare for all – but it’s obvious that he had never intended to do that or even a weak public option. No single payer advocate was even allowed at the health care hearings run by baucus. This alone should have shown every single democrat that obama was a fraud. I, for one, will be estatic if he is voted out of office in 2012. It’s horrible thought to have a republican in the white house, but I would rather see that than a man posing as a democrat and screwing with peoples (democrats) lives. I want to see him slink out of the white house, rat that he is. But, bottom line, obama has shown all of us that we have a one-party system. Oh wait, clinton did that too.
Zinn puts Carter in that category too. Lumps Carter-Reagan-Bush together as starting to reverse the gains of the 1960s, under some ironic title like “return to normalcy.”
And like Clinton, the more you peel the layers off of Carter, the more it becomes apparent. Just another RWM. Of course, he didn’t go as far as any of his successors, but remember that this is a cumulative political process. So, to take just 2 examples: Carter Doctrine is that U.S. will steal ME oil via military force & on economics he started the meme that wage gains are inflationary.
Just another talking point for Obama’s, “I suck less campaign”
x2
Medicaid expansion will never occur as passed…
As the USA Today article this am showed — states are already ‘discounting’ benefits in anticipation of the law possibly going into effect — so if it is still intact — the benefits will be cut much, much further by then…
making medicaid WORSE than 3rd world health care.
But, hey, to Obama, apparently this is a feature, not a bug.
You owe me a drink.
People I talk to haven’t the vaguest idea what Obamacare does or doesn’t do. It’s a big, black hole for most people I bet. The Obama supporters I talk to are predictable–be thankful for the crumbs, something is better than nothing, etc. Really, that’s Obama’s pattern. Dole out crumbs and remind everyone that a Republican wouldn’t offer even that. So, it really comes down to electing someone who offers a pittance versus someone who offers nothing.
If had done anything at all to me this a WTF
thanks for the link. It’s funny how Big Zero made a big deal of pretending that the Presidency doesn’t have a lot of power to get middle and working class policies enacted when he had Dem majorities in Congress, and now that he has a Repub House; it’s all the big bad Republican’s fault.
Kabuki, or Lying Sack of Shit, thy name is Obama.
It’s worse than that. It’s someone who sells out the U.S. taxpayer to his ins corp & PhRMA millions dollar supporters under the guise of doling out crumbs.
I’ve often heard Dodd-Frank referred to as a big shit sandwich …
well let’s just complete the presidential run of bad luck we’ve had. Read James Douglass’ book about JFK. It’s pretty obvious to all informed on Washington politics that Kennedy was the last progressive leader we’ve had. He attempted to kneecap the military/industrial complex and pull the country back to being a democracy. Every other person who’s entered the oval office is aware of the JFK episode.
I for one am not too quick to condemn Johnson, Carter or Clinton, when you understand that they were all up against a shadowy, behind-the-scenes fascist power structure. When you look at it in context, those presidents actually accomplished a few things. But starting with Clinton, and now Obama one would have to conclude that the Dems (the bluedogs and centrists, DNC) all work for the plutocracy. Sure, we’ve got our Sanders, Kucinich, Kaptor, and some other solid leaders, but what good are they if they don’t step forward at this time to primary Obama.
My adult read on JFK is as a great supporter of MIC. I admit that as an impressionable college student, he was the only preznit whose charisma snookered me just a lil bit. But he was a great supporter of MIC (missile gap) & his father was hardly the model of progressive.
The value of Zinn’s take on history is that it is all about the 1%ers vs. 99%ers. So while it may exaggerate the slant of policy under one prez or another, it does MAKE you look at each one from the other POV.
Besides Zinn is not the only one who looks at JFK as warmongering. Carroll’s House of War makes the same point.
I also reject the “they were up against shadowy blah blah blahs” meme. Occam’s razor leads to the fully cooperative meme. You’d have to provide a lot of evidence that the devil-made-me-do-it to dispute Occam’s razor.
The bill will probably eliminate all private coverage for abortion. Gee, thanks.
Bravo, well said, I’m with you!
Any/all tee-insy advances women’s movements made during 1960s are largely already reversed completely, or about to be.
“The Medicaid expansion should have started within 60 days of the bill passing.”
There are not nearly enough doctors willing to accept Medicaid now. Adding 15 million eligible recipients would have exposed the fatal flaw of this gambit. We need access to actual healthcare, not insurance that no one will accept.
And as was mentioned earlier, there is little chance that a Medicaid expansion will be funded regardless of who wins in 2012.
Without a primary it will go on and on as Obama wins in 2012 – indeed Obamacare will be a plus because the media sells it as the first universal care and never does an analysis.
Carter and Clinton were/are center-left, strong on social and weak on fighting the corporations control of Military and Intel and much of Congress – Carter gave us the strongest mental health care bill ever which is why 6 months after he took office Reagan killed it in his Aug 1981 budget via making it a “block grant for anything”. Likewise Clinton got in trouble trying to make it OK to be gay in the military and was met by Congress – including many Dems to the point of a veto proof majority – being ready to make Reagan’s executive order that made being gay a dis-qualifier for military service into formal legislation, being stopped only by Clinton getting (most of) the Joint Chiefs to endorse Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Folks forget how that “liberal” action cost the Democrats votes – but it started the change in attitudes that allow Obama to end military anti-gay discrimination and get DADT repealed.
Obama has been the first Center-Right Democrat elected President in my life – he is to the right of the Blue Dogs – except at election time.
jon Walker is nothing, if not naive.
I’m grateful that my 19 year old can still be covered. However, our new policy changes require us to pay way more of the costs on top of the insurance premiums.
At best, it’s a mixed bag.
I don’t see how he sells it unless there has been a significant dent made in the numbers without insurance.
ooopsie.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-17-uninsured17_ST_N.htm
We’ve moved in the wrong direction.
JFK was my “first” election love (although I was fond of Stevenson) – and I agree his Dad was a rich snob unconcerned with righting social wrongs.
But JFK was not in bed with the MIC – indeed many suspect his refusal to kneel to the Dulles brothers, Hover, and the MIC was the reason he was killed.
He was willing to run with a political issue even after it was shown to him to not be an issue – he began the campaign thinking there was a missile shortage on the US side, but even after he was shown that there was no shortage he continued the use of that claim.
That’s about the weakest defense of Carter-Clinton I could imagine. You assert that they were center-left of social issues, yet to take an example of two, one could easily argue that Clinton’s handling of gays-in-military set back integration by his ham-handedness, which is the net result of his I-feel-your-pain kabuki for all of those issues.
WRT HillaryCare, I’d almost go to the extreme that she planned it to be a debacle. Only I think she’s not that competent.
Enough said.
CLASS was in the law. Now it’s not. Most congressional supporters of the long-term care program found out from the media.
Oh good reminder. Long term care, how quaint is that. Let the really old & disabled go out & get 3 jobz. Wazza matter with them anyhoo.
But I had great news today. I’m rich and never new it. My gov’t employee health insurance is eligible for the Cadillac Tax. And I remember Obama telling us it was a tax only the rich would pay, so it must be so.
It’s gotten very little publicity, but it appears most public sector health insurance plans will “qualify.” You can find out by looking at actuarial reports for retirement systems that offer health insurance. It would take some work.
I’m delighted to allow some of you to share my joy.
Geez. I have often said & typed that our (99%ers) imaginations are not ‘rich’ enough to figure out how we’re being screwed. And I was already hinting at that when I was working on Wall St.
I’m sorry for your loss is, I believe, the cliche that covers yet another raping of the 99%ers by the 1%ers.
If Obama and the democrats had told the USA Citizens who was blocking the Public Opption or Buy Into Medicare and killed or refused to sign obamacare.We The People would have Voted for Democrats in the 2010 elections.Obama and the democrats were bought by Trader Lobbiest.The democrats sold out WE The People.
I think we’re the only ones left. I’m off to continue reading THE GREAT INFLUENZA by John M. Barry. It’s well done and refreshing because it’s beyond my usual ares of interest.
Good night eCAHN and anyone else still out there.
O was against against what you advance. If the electorate had known that, who do you think they would have voted for & why would it have mattered.
The Great Influenza is a great book. Not for the parts about thousands of people dropping dead, which are morbidly fascinatinog, but primarily for the concurrent efforts by scientists to figure out what caused influenza and what caused it to mutate. Part of this research led to the discovery of DNA. I highly recommend the book.
Thanks for the rec. The Great Influenza, which I haven’t read, but have picked up pieces of, sez a great deal about the incompetence and inhumanity of 2011 U.S.
Sometime you have to take a strong stand. There was polls of 70%+ of The People that wanted the Public Opption.Obama has the Bullie Pulpit.Look at OWS don’t you think not passing obamacare would have been been better for the democrats 2010 elections?
Everyone I know with insurance has higher copay and there insurance cost a lot more.
We’ll likely be joining you in that bracket(we’re private sector but FRA regulates rails so we have almost the equivalent of federal bennies.) Our annual premium will cost over the $24,000 allowable. In anticipation our health care company (from what I understand they are the ones who actually pay the tax)has already increased the cost of ER visits, requires a $500 deductible for hospitalizations(except for cancer because for some odd reason they’re excluded.) and will be charging 5% on things like tests(up to $2000). Oh and now if it isn’t an ER visit my doctor will now need to get authorization before performing things like X Rays or prescribing drugs like imitrex. Oh joyous, because everyone knows that the guy sitting in an office in a for profit administration job is much more capable of deciding what care you really need.
Talk about making it easy for the GOP and their industry financiers.
How many more state-level “opt-outs” will Obama grant before election day?
Another example of the mind bogglingly stupid political strategy of Obama. Kind of hard to run on the positive things of the ACA when they don’t go into effect until 2 years AFTER your re-election campaign.
What was the political strategy of that?
My impression is that Lyndon Johnson was way to the left of JFK on domestic issues, notably, in his all-out support of civil rights legislation (Kennedy was very tentative) and his sweeping Great Society which included Medicare. In foreign and military affairs, however, Johnson was a tool of the MIC as, I believe, have been all post World War II Presidents with the possible partial exceptions of Eisenhower with his public identification of the MIC, Carter with respect to his emphasis on human rights, and believe it or not, Reagan insofar as he had an apparently sincere wish to eliminate nuclear weapons . Kennedy was a moderate to conservative Democrat by the standards of those days (obviously, far to the left of the recent Democratic presidents).
I have never bought Oliver Stone’s hypothesis that Kennedy was assassinated because he wanted to pull out of Vietnam. The Best and the Brightest who plotted the war (Dean Rusk, McGeorge Bundy, Robert McNamara) were in Kennedy’s inner circle. They masterminded the assassination of Vietnam President Diem only three months before the assassination, and Diem’s assassination started the slide toward major war.
The difference between those days and the present is that the MIC stranglehold basically extended only to military/foreign relations issues. Domestically, Democrats had a wide leeway, were under strong union influence, and often initiated very progressive programs.
I may be wrong and I hope I am, but…..
I have always believed that they set the bulk of ObamaCare to come into play in 2014 so they can use it to get Obama in again and then sometime during the Lame Duck, the Repubs can play bad cop and yank it on some pretense or another.
I know the Repubs want another term for Obama who has delivered for them as much or more than any Repub president could and the Lame Duck is going to throw the pretense of Obama being anything but a hard core right winger right out the door. Even though it will never be officially admitted because what’s the point when confusion and unabated shameless lying has mesmerized the masses into a complete and total “illogical – does not compute” political comatose mode.
Not only will they pull the plug on most of Obamacare but it will turn out to be even more control of people than anyone has expected. Why because it is set up on the Welfare model and welfare controls you life and oversees all your income, further you may not own anything of value. And what people haven’t figure out yet and no one tells anybody is the banks are privatizing welfare. They have an army of controlled workers and people forced to “not own anything” and report to them regularly about everything, even about who they’re fucking and what they have. They can’t just allow us to have single payer and not control our every move.
Anyone want to bet me that Obama will hand over SS in the Lame Duck. I know the Repubs will but Obama has already been paid to do so, so you can count on him winning.
I don’t care what Michael Moore says about this. OWS may not be about candidates but if we just let Obama waltz back in after the lying and the protecting the criminal banks we might as well all go home and shove our heads up our asses.
yep, people are lining up to forget the greatest political fraud of all time and that’s saying A LOT. Poor people sent him money hoping for health care and Obama sold them out like he never knew them after so many months of sincere lengthy lying. IT’s chilling and he has no character what so ever. NONE.
Well, the ad won’t work. It won’t work as there hasn’t been that much benefit right from a alot of people now unless you already were doing okay. For example, the extended coverage for children under a policy to the age of 26. Unless you had such a policy that included older children to begin with, well kids out of luck. The high risk pools the same as they were costing up to $800 a month if a person survived to get into them. The Obama admin also excluded abortion from the policies even though the law did not require the restriction.
Very few people have seen any benefits, and only if one could spare alot of extra money or lucky to be under certain programs. Is it any wonder the apologists have to rely on dreams of future Lala land of milk and honey to sell it.
“I have always believed that they set the bulk of ObamaCare to come into play in 2014 so they can use it to get Obama in again and then sometime during the Lame Duck, the Repubs can play bad cop and yank it on some pretense or another.”
Exactly. All that will be left is the mandate to purchase private insurance.