Welcome to a brand new age of political cynicism in America! According to a new poll from Pew, the American people have become dramatically more cynical about the chances of bipartisanship over the past two years. From Pew:
The public continues to say they want Obama and Republican leaders to work together, but there is considerable skepticism that this will occur. About six-in-ten (61%) say GOP leaders should try to work with Obama to accomplish things, even if it means disappointing some groups of Republican supporters. A similar percentage (65%) says Obama should do the same in working with Republicans.
But by roughly two-to-one (63% to 30%), most Americans think Republicans and Democrats will end up bickering and opposing one another more than usual this year. This is a far more pessimistic view than the public expressed two years ago. Shortly before Obama took office in January 2009, just 39% predicted increased partisanship, while half (50%) thought Republicans and Democrats would work together more than usual over the course of that year.
Since the last two years have seen a record number of filibusters and a unprecedented level of obstructionism from Senate Republicans, no one should be surprised if the public has little hope for the prospects of honest bipartisanship.
This heightened partisanship has, overall, likely hurt both parties, since the number of Americans self-identified with either of the top major parties is among the lowest in decades. Yet, looking at the 2010 election result, it seems clear that, in the near term, it is the Democrats that have suffered relatively more as a result of the growth in cynicism.
This shouldn’t be surprising, either. Democrats were in total control, so even though Republican obstructionism prevented them from taking action, Democrats still got the blame for failing to get things done while in power.
Probably of equal importance is that Barack Obama actually made promoting bipartisanship, ending the “red state, blue state” divide, hope and change such big campaign promises. Even though Republicans have worked against this, they also never made delivering bipartisanship or change the tentpole promise of their party. Unlike Obama, the Republicans didn’t set a standard for themselves that the opposition could so easily stop them from achieving.



53 Comments
Very discouraging to see that more people think Obama should accommodate Republicans than visa versa.
Seconded.
Does the country *really* need more D capitulation?
I think I would characterize the thought that Obama and the Democrats will oppose Republicans as optimism rather than cynicism…
Yet another poll can only remind me of this old joke
You’d have to be brain dead not to be cynical about pols IMO.
Power of propaganda.
To take the edge off the cynicism tonight, martinis are being served during the cocktail hour. Hold out your glasses.
“Since the last two years have seen a record number of filibusters and a unprecedented level of obstructionism from Senate Republicans, no one should be surprised if the public has little hope for the prospects of honest bipartisanship.”
I don’t really care if they are bipartisan or not. I just want them to act like adults and do their darned jobs. I’m sick of the theatrics, the stalling, and the lies. Just do your job and represent the people not the corporation waving dollars at you to dance for them.
By trying to be bipartisanship by surrendering to the GOP on everything Obama has lost the respect of the GOP they know he won’t stand up for what he believes assuming he believes in anything that is.
This has created an atmosphere where no deal can be done. Both sides must respect each other to make fair deals.
If I hold out my glasses, I won’t be able to see my drink. Oh, well…what the heck.
Thanks! Here is my glass. No olives please.
Drink of a few flowers:
Grapefruit juice
Orange juice
lemon juice
lime juice
ginger simple syrup
vodka
Slainte!
YUM! I’d like to add a splash of Chambord to that.
Reminds me of one of the many long car trips my family of 5 took when we were kids. Can’t remember what landmark we were looking for, but Dad (always the driver) told us to keep our eyes pealed for it. I told my bros to hold my eyeglasses while I pealed my eyes.
I thought olives were the whole point of martinis. I take one reg green pimento stuffed & one green jalopena stuffed.
lol. Peeling the eye *is* unappealing if you consider the literal meaning.
Saw that on foodnetwork recently. Can’t remember which chef. Sounds wunnerful.
Must be brutal in NH, considering last night bottomed out at -2.6 degrees several hundred miles south of you. I hope the bee girls aren’t shivering too badly. I’m tempted to go out & cover the hives with my old down comforter, but not so much as to actually do it.
They are. I have indigestion today. I also love the little cocktail onions too.
“Unappealing’ never stopped me from taking advantage of ambiguous language. You might have noticed.
Sorry about your indigestion. Hoping a nice sippy martini will help ya out.
Ina Garten is the chef and my loverly wife (she who falls down and hurts her knee) is drinking one right now
Yep the bees are surrounded (almost) with 1″ foam insulation and are buzzing aloud.
Thanks. I love martinis of all kinds, but especially the sweeter versions like a Cosmos or surfer.
Fixed it for you.
The capitulations of the Obama Crime Administration could make Mother Teresa cynical. And I ain’t no Mother Teresa.
“Republican obstructionism” was a tactic used by Democrats to hide behind much of their “keep the status quo as much as possible” legislation.
Not sure if it’s the polls that are flawed or the dumbasses who responded to it. If such a large percentage of the public would like both parties to work together, then why does the republican party seem to feel that compromise is equal to capitulation.
Just curious: what’s the fascination with keeping bees? Is this a side business, a hobby, for people who don’t like cats and dogs, what?
You got it backwards. It’s the Dems who conflate compromise with capitulation. That’s why they do nothing but capitulate. (Besides, of course, take money under the table.)
My particular cynicism is that in effect both parties, no matter how much they seemingly oppose each other, are interested only in serving the corporations, and have no interest in achieving any real progress in serving the American citizen as such. I’ve pretty much lost hope
Thought she was the one. I like her recipes a lot.
One of the probs I have with cooking schools & foodnetwork is: if one flavor is good, and two are great, and 3 might be spectacular, 13 flavors must be 7th heaven.
Part of my general view that bad whatever (religion, politics, athletics, art, food, etc etc) drives out good, as each iteration drives the prior one to more & more extremes.
Ina Garten seems to know when to stop. As does Giarda.
Hey, Honey! I don’t do bees but I love veggies, flowers, and HONEY!
…work together to get something done…compromise….move forward…lean forward…bipartisanship….capitulation…BS, all of it.
I would differ. My model is that Ds willingly encourage the Rs to move more & more to the right (by spinelessness among other tactics), so that the Ds can move to the right, while advertising: WE SUCK LEZ.
I am really cynical about all this cynicism.
Becuz the Rs get the majority of the corp donations. And $$$ are more important in U.S. politics than votes.
Exactamundo! Simply not doing their jobs!
Succinct & accurate.
Meanwhile dinner awaits. So enjoy cocktails & I’ll bbl.
And they caused the cynicism! How do they expect anybody to trust them with anything? Uh, I guess they don’t as long as we don’t look behind the curtain.
Which makes the president’s endless quest for acceptance and “bipartisan support” on every issue all the more troubling and quixotic.
http://www.sunstateactivist.org/ssablog/
We accepted him already. He screwed that one up, more than four times!
Hey, what part of the country are you from, if you don’t mind me asking?
I’m off to make dinner. Prolly an omelet. BBL
That is definitely their election strategy.
Exactly. The irony here is that we’ve had too much bipartisanship already.
What exactly is the point of ‘working with’ Republicans? They have nothing to offer unless you’re in the top 2%.
Just south of the L.A. airport about ten miles.
Thanks.
Okay, did my location give you any insight, other than where I live? Or was where I live enough to explain my question about bee-keeping?
eli is upstairs!
NYT Film Critic Accidentally Writes Column About Politics
Seems no one here caught the conflagration of skepticism with cynicism, which does have a distinct difference. I would bet all here know the difference but respondents may not. Therefore interpretations of data amount to a pile of dog doo doo!
oh really?
or are you still conflating a minority filibuster with a majority requirement, not mandated by the rules, of passage of a cloture vote (which 41 senators can block)?
i’m sure as hell more politically cynical than i was a few years ago… and it’s mostly because of reading too much bullshit propaganda. where’s your evidence? where’s the critical analysis of the evidence?
I’m impugning Pew/Yahoo interpretations of the data regarding skeptical of bipartisanship or cynical of the whole process. Please don’t misunderstand me, I too think the senate is the place where democracy dies,( although a case could be made for scotus.)
I wish I were able to add to the dialog when the thread is “hot”. Usually I’m late to the game, sigh.
We’ll see. Personally I think it’s all kabuki to blame it on republicans and avoid responsibility. Even Democrats can’t offer bills without bucking party leadership, but they aren’t going to bitch about it in public.
I see Selise has showed up to offer some facts, but nothing gets through. It’s just like teatards screaming “socialism!”