All over the country right now elected moderates in the Republican Party are probably not sleeping easy as the result of Christine O’Donnell’s surprise victory in Delaware. The reason for their dread is that frankly O’Donnell is a bad candidate, Mike Castle was a really good general election candidate and Delaware is extremely blue state. They may be thinking if O’Donnell can beat Castle in deep blue Delaware, none of us are safe.
Christine O’Donnell’s victory last week is different from other Tea Party-backed primary upsets. Marco Rubio forced moderate Charlie Crist out of the Republican Party in Florida, but Rubio has been a good candidate with successful history in politics and was electable in a swing state like Florida. In Nevada, Sharron Angle beat Sue Lowden but Lowden was damaged goods and the state likely an unlosable race. Ken Buck was polling as strongly as Jane Norton in Colorado’s general. Despite Alaska’s Senate candidate Joe Miller clearly being less electable than incumbent Lisa Murkowski, the state is red enough that in this current political environment Miller’s credibility might not matter.
With O’Donnell the dynamics are very different. O’Donnell is a bad candidate. She has already run for statewide office twice and lost. She has a host of bizarre statements and positions that can be used against her from fear of mice with human brains to her vocal opposition to masturbation. Her polling numbers are terrible in the general election and she’ll likely lose.
On the other hand Mike Castle was also a great general election candidate because of his unique history in the state. Not only was he almost guaranteed to win but national Republican groups probably didn’t need to spend a dime to help him, freeing up money for tighter races. Despite it being a good year for Republicans, having an almost guaranteed pick up in one of the blue states in the union is a very rare thing for a party. There is probably no other moderate in the Republican Party who could more justifiably use the electability argument in their defense.
This is what should make O’Donnell’s victory so deeply frightening to GOP moderates everywhere. O’Donnell was the “wrong” insurgent candidate, Castle was the “wrong” moderate to try to take out and Delaware was the “wrong” state. Yet despite all that Castle was still taken out. What this means is there is no moderate Republican, no matter how electable, no matter how blue their district and no matter how poor their potential primary challenger can truly feel safe.
The move might not be as foolish as for conservatives many think
Many are trying to depict the conservative support of O’Donnell as pure foolishness costing Republicans a seat in the Senate, this may not be the case. The loss of a single seat which would vote with them 60-70% of the time is a clearly a loss from their policy perspective. But over the long term I can see how the sacrifice might be worth it. By putting the fear in every moderate Republican everywhere in the country, O’Donnell’s primary win could have the effect of moving rightward dozens of conservative members of Congress who now feel unsafe voting against their base.
Wayne Wheeler of the Anti-Saloon League — probably one of the most powerful and suave political activists in American history — understood the importance of fear. Wheeler forced through the passage of the 18th amendment not because huge majorities in Congress on a personal level strongly agreed with prohibition, but because they were afraid to vote against the prohibitionist base. In politics you don’t elected officials to agree with you; you just need them to be too afraid to vote against you.



44 Comments
I remember when Delaware was a solidly Republican state. But in those days, Republicans were much more moderate and rational than this Next Generation.
No wonder Mike Castle got bumped off.
Minor note:
Should be “she has already run for statewide office. . .”
I long for the day when we DFH strike such fear in the hearts of Democrats.
And “holding our noses & voting for the lesser of two evils” is NOT the way to get there!!!
The Republican split in Florida, Delaware, Kentucky (whakjob there), and Alaska (specially Alaska !!) can only be good news for the Democrats. Just hope they take advantage of it and decide to run strong campaigns based on helping the unemployed, improving the environment, fixing our health care and financial system for working families and small business. If they do that and keep pounding away at it, they have a good choice of getting committed votes. They (and the President) need to re-focus on real issues instead of the loony goony issues in order to succeed….its not rocket science.
In some happy alternate universe the headline would be
For Liberals Making Every Dem Moderate Fear Them Might be Worth Losing Arkansas
Good column, and something to keep in mind whenever a professional Goper starts decrying tea party candidates.
Why do the real moderates stay in the wacky party? There aren’t that many of them, and they’d feel very comfortable with the Blue Dogs who are their natural allies.
This is exactly why the Tea Party Deciders, tweeting through Sarah Palin, are encouraging O’Donnell to stay off the national TV programs. They know O’Donnell is such a whack job, she will frighten even some Tea Partiers. Palin originally advised O’Donnell to “speak through Fox”. She’s done an about-face and now tweets:
That could only be because she got instructions from the Deciders to encourage O’donnell to keep her head down. Nobody here really thinks Palin acts on her own do you? She’s a puppet. Who are her puppetmasters? Cheney? Kristol? Perle?
If you mean you are staying home on Nov 2, I hope you will reconsider. In Ohio, Gov Strickland is down by 11 pts against a right-wing candidate John Kasich. Lee Fisher is down by 20 points against Bush economic advisor “overshores” Rob Portman in the race for Senate. I think these kind of poll results are because Democrats might be planning to stay home. If Democrats stay home, and candidates like these win, how will you feel? Will you feel like you taught Pres Obama, Speaker Pelosi, Harry Reid a lesson? The Repub candidates I mentioned are people who are committed to standing on the rock that is now suffocating many people in this country, and destroying the possibility of prosperity for most of us for the next generation. Who will have been taught a lesson if you don’t vote? Or worse, vote for Republicans?
Ain’t that the truth! We already have bogs about her witchcraft experiment. Adios
Rinse and repeat?
Ummm, you seem to have overlooked two alternatives: third parties or a write-in.
Isn’t this an officially recognized oxymoron? … jus sayin
They aren’t viable alternatives in our system.
Christine O’Donnell’s primary victory, in the words of Jon Stewart, is hurting America. It means that GOPs will be less likely to bolt their shrinking party to compromise with Democrats on Capitol Hill, while elected Democrats see success through moving into the now-vacant moderate right-center axis.
It means liberals and progressives have less voice than ever, unless we find a way to teach Democrats to fear us. Hmm, what Senators are up in 2012 that could provide such an object lesson?
Why, lookee here: Connecticut and California!
Only because you refuse to vote for them.
I think reasonable people will actually vote for reasonable candidates. (I don’t know Strickland or Fisher, so I don’t know if they are real Dems or corporatists.) I think people are saying, “I’m not going to vote for Blue Dogs, for wafflers, for fake Dems.” I have contacted my Senator and my Representative and told them that they MUST stand up for Social Security and Medicare and other progressive causes. I told Barbara Boxer that if she loses to Fiorina, she can thank Obummer for stealing her seat by bad-mouthing/mocking/trashing those who brung him. If my Congresspeople won’t stand up for me, I won’t stand up for them. ‘Nuff said.
Whose fault was it that we are stuck with Fisher? The DSCC interfered in the primary and destroyed the more progressive candidate who had more grassroots support and was a better politician.
But just like those anonymous WH sources in November, all losses will solely be the fault of stupid progressives, not incompetent Dems in DC
Isn’t that the essential curiosity of these times?
I understand that I was completely wrong about Reagan in 1980, and I’ve come to a much better understanding of my mis-reading the American electorate that year, but nothing explains for me this seemingly endless refusal by the Rockefeller repubs et al. to stand up for what they believe in…
I like your “standing on a rock suffocating us” analogy.
Voting for third parties or write-ins may be an alternative as some have suggested, but all it does is drain away the votes needed to keep a D majority. Like it or not, imho, if Repubs win, we go back to the dark ages.
Anyone remember a guy by the name of Ralph Nader? I despise that man for taking the votes from Gore in 2000 that allowed the SC to decide our Presidential dimwit for the next eight years.
Good article Jon. With the defeat of Castle, Olympia Snowe has to be wondering about her own path to re-election in 2012.
After Castle’s defeat, CNN reported that “Few Republican lawmakers were as stung by Rep. Mike Castle’s surprising loss to his conservative GOP opponent as Maine Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe.” Last fall, after she voted for the HCR bill in the Senate Finance Committee, Tim Pawlenty warned her not to deviate from Republican Party orthodoxy. After that, she didn’t dare vote for the final bill. If she wants any chance of getting re-nominated as a Republican, she’s going to have to, from here on out, vote like a Jim DeMint Republican.
It just struck me that a vote as a teachable moment is quite potent. If I vote for Boxer she is one up; abstain, she’s one down; vote Fiorina and that’s a fucking swing.
How would you vote?
Agreed. In some cases there are moderate Republicans who are MORE progressive than the blue dogs. That said, Nevada’s election is hardly “unlosable” for Angle. Right leaning Rasmussen has her down by a couple of points to Reid. If she had lost the primary, he’d be a goner.
Plus Murkowski’s write in candidacy could actually give us TWO Dems from Alaska. All Pissy’s Chrissy win has done is divide the Thuggies and shifted them to the right. I think it’ll hasten their extinction and just have their moderate members jumping ship.
Just out of curiosity why don’t you hate the Dems for driving progressives away? I mean, it’s kinda hilarious to hear how the dark ages are going to be the fault of the voters who refuse to support Dems, rather than the Dems not delivering on their promises. Why don’t you put your energies into getting the Dem leadership to deliver as a way to win voters back, rather than complaining about voters looking for alternatives to a deeply corrupt and immoral party?
Just shows me it’s time for Lympie (who has publicly complained about how small the party is growing) to come piss into the “big” tent instead of our of it.
Don’t these Congress critters who have been around for quite a few years have homes, children and grandchildren to go back to. They cling to those seats in Congress as if to a life raft.
looks a little different when considered within the context of Dem Congr Leadership taking the tool of Reconciliation out of their own hands
Looking forward, millions of americans and their families will be thrown from the lifeboat on 9/30 when the TANF Emergency Fund expires. 51 votes would have saved them – why should I concern myself with Republicans suffocating anything ?
I am not going to get into a spitting contest with you.
I am not saying everything is sweet in Candyland. I am a progressive, I do not like a lot of the things that have happened in the last two years, but I do not want to go backward and that is exactly what will happen with the Repugs. All you have to do is listen to their continual “No’s” on everything up to and including Tom Coburn holding up better inspections on the food we eat.
Your vote is your choice, I have no control over it, but my vote will be to TRY to work within the system, and continue to work for progressive goals.
Do we have a long way to go, you bet, but I came to this site in 2005 because it promoted the ideas that I was in favor of and for me, those were dark days in the Bush Admin. This site helped me through those tough times.
The thing I like about FDL is that it is a progressive site, respects opinions of others, and promotes interaction of those opinions.
Sometimes the commenters do not see eye to eye, this is one of them.
I’m not spitting, I was genuinely curious. The hostility directed toward Nader voters always baffles me, when looked at from a different perspective the fault resides elsewhere. FWIW, I voted for Gore, but I have never gotten the Nader thing.
I think the other thing that makes us see things differently is I feel like I am still living in the dark ages under the Dems. I feel like I now live in a police state, and it has gotten worse under Obama, not better. I know I keep harping on this, but living in MA as a frequent flier, the police state has gotten up-close-and-personal at Logan airport and I don’t know how to stop it.
Drones are being deployed on our borders. Tasers are used against people who are in no way resisting arrest. Every phone call, every email, every bank statement is recorded. PA is outsourcing spying on Americans to Israel. Blackwater/Xe is still getting lucrative contracts. The AfPak war is escalating, now we’re threatening Yemen, and oh yeah, Obama says he can assassinate American citizens just because he says so. If you are politically connected the law does not apply to you, and if you are not, it doesn’t protect you.
I honestly don’t see how it gets worse if Republicans pick up a few seats. Even if they get the majority, how does this get worse?
The Dems are planning to cut social security. The Dems have already mandated tithing to for-profit insurance companies without doing anything to bring costs down to make healthcare affordable, even for those of us with insurance. Wall Street is still ripping me off, as they have done for years, in no small part due to the efforts of Summers and Geithner.
Maybe if the Reps find themselves back in the majority at least the Dems will go through the motions of opposing their policies. Something has got to give, and with Obama hurling insults our way I doubt they have big plans to change course.
I’m in the dark ages now, so I’m looking somewhere else for some light.
I don’t think it would work.
They would just write us off and move more to the right and try to pick up the moderates the Republicans are abandoning.
They get on TV. Reporters and media celebrities want to talk to them and write down their opinions. Powerful people try to cut deals with them. They are motivated by status, vanity, and power. They would lose almost all of that if they retired.
Of course, the power can only be used within the confines of the system. If a politician tries to use their vote and voice to expose corruption, reduce corporate influence, and empower the citizenry to take back their government, they are usually ignored, and otherwise maligned and smeared if they become too much of a threat.
power,the great aphrodisiac
also,they get many freebees,fancy eateries and such,used to know a senator and his wife,they never paid for spit
Sorry about the spitting comment.
In reading your post here, I see myself in 2005 and it is really frustrating isn’t it.
You make a lot of good, real good points about your frustration and I respect them totally.
I am not sure how we can change this in short order. Yes, we need to make the D’s see the light of the Progressive movement and no they are not there yet.
Russ Feingold is my hero and he is not a Senator from my state. He is not afraid to take stands that are unpopular, holds out votes that are not in the progressive interest, and damn the consequences.
We really are on the same page, just looking at things a little differently about the way to handle the upcoming vote.
I am late responding because of a phone call so I hope you get this message and understand that I respect every one of your opinions on this.
Agreed : ) The difference is in tactics, not in goals. And of course all of the frustrations are really close to the surface with the election so close and feeling like the Dems in DC just don’t give a damn. I’m so frustrated I really do not know what to do. It’s pretty discouraging, especially when we swept the Dems in with such a huge mandate. How the heck did they manage to squander it so completely?
I remember towards the end of Bush’s term all the talk about how the Rep brand had been destroyed for a generation. I’ve heard similar foolishness lately about the Dems. I suspect we are in a death spiral with the two parties, neither serving the public interest, getting kicked to the curb every two years as anti-incumbent aggravation builds until we finally find a way to put both parties out of our misery. Well, that’s my hope anyway : )
ugh, as a Delawarean, I was prepared to vote for Castle and see him retire in 4 years because, in my view, launching Coons into the Beltway is going to really, really pain progressives everywhere. But yeah, I have no choice but to vote for him now.
A local radio jock wrote that the rise of O’Donnell and the shifting of the GOP to the right as the DEMs keep the center is the genius reward of Clinton and the DLCers. Some fucking fun…
Does respecting the opinions of others include despising others, of implying that others will be at fault if the awful Rethugs, whom Obama has been, you will recall, courting with “bipartisanship”?
Does respect entail telling us that what we saw, in print, of Obama’s clear promises, what we heard with our own ears, of Obama’s promises, an Obama many worked for thinking that, as a black man, Obama would be good for the country, and the vote alone, by itself, Was and IS a sign of the good of the country … does respect mean telling us we never saw or heard such things … that we are lying and making things up?
Does respect mean telling people who have watched, closely, the political scene for longer than Obama has been alive, people who were willing and happy to donate time and effort and ideas, people who had and have good, indeed wonderful, ideas, ideas that still must be implemented to avert serious economic and social disaster, that they are “effing r*****s”, in need of a drug test, and of “getting” a “real” life?
Does respect mean peddling fear?
Or does “respect” mean something else perhaps, like appreciation, or at least, tolerance AND the understanding that people who do not agree with you are, possibly, neither stupid nor uninformed?
Apparently, what phred suggested, regarding a party having actual accomplishments and a moral compass is less important than “winning”, when such “winning” simply means more of the same.
Frankly, AC2, it matters little who is in power because the “system” is so corrupt, economically and legally, specifically as regards the rule of law, as Obama has continued and extended the worst of the Bush-Cheney Executive power grab, and the military has far to much power, politically and, in terms of the amount of the nation’s “wealth and treasure”, a stranglehold on the nation’s “looking forward” future, that regardless of who is in “power”, as they are both essentially the same, in spite of YOUR assertions that, somehow, they are not … our society faces very hard times … and to be brutally honest … the pain ought to be shared equally, and the blame, let’s not put it on “progressives”, or even the T-baggers, but on those who have had and do have power, especially Obama who had, despite those who dispute it, a genuine and heartfelt mandate to actually make some changes, which as President, with majorities in both the House and Senate, as well as each and every one of those “Democratic” Senators and Representatives, he and the Democrats COULD have done?
At the very least, respect means not calling others stupid or blaming them for the failures of others.
When the spill in the Gulf occurred, certain pundits intoned, “We are all responsible for this catastrophe.”
But look who is still in business, the largest supplier to the US military, aka Bee Pee.
When the economic meltdown occurred, certain pundits intoned, “It was those who could not afford these homes, but really we are all to blame.”
But look who is getting huge, actually obscene, “bonuses”?
Now you can say, “It’s systemic, and the D’s can’t fix it over-night”
Righto, AC2, righto.
Wonder when they plan to start?
Righto, right after they defeat the awful, evil R’s … well soon thereafter, anyhow.
But it’s hard, doncha know?
Righto.
Now, you will note, AC2, that at no point did I take you, personally, to task or suggest that it will be your fault if disaster befalls us? Nor did phred, for that matter.
Those who differ from you have never said you are to blame, yet you, and other partisans who agree with your viewpoint, charge us with such “responsibility” constantly and consistently,
Nobody “lost” 2000, but the Dems, Gore and Lieberman.
Frankly, AC2, I voted AGAINST Lieberman AND Gore’s apparently happy choice of Lieberman as his running-mate.
And, you know, just between us, AC2, Gore’s behavior, during Bush v. Gore, was not inspiring, to say the least.
Kind of cowardly, like the D’s in general, and certain ones, in particular.
These times, clearly, call for courage and bold innovation, not capitulation to selfish greed, mindless fear, and state secrecy, “secret” law and killing at a distance on the whims of one man or woman. Democrat or Republican. The President of the United States of America.
In my opinion.
DW
Are you insinuating that there were Rove-inspired antics by the Dems to disrupt the Rethug primary, to improve Coons’ chances of winning the general election?
One flaw in the theory:
Delaware’s primary system is party only — ie, independents aren’t allowed to vote in them. If I’m Olympia Snowe in Maine, where independents can vote, this race doesn’t scare me so much. I still wouldn’t take the Tea Party insurgent lightly, but it’s a much bigger climb for them in moderate/blue states where independents can vote in primaries. Just look at NH — the insurgent Tea Party candidate lost to the establishment pick, even if the margin was small. The establishment pick certainly would have lost had it not been for the fact independents could vote in it. She may have lost badly without those independent votes.
That’s inevitable… the ‘striking fear’ episode for us in that state was the primary, which we unfortunately lost*.
*The election, of course, was almost certainly rigged for the incumbent. Sadly. And to the Democratic Party’s demise.
I second every thing you said. Excellent post.
I suspect because they never wanted or intended to do the things we wanted them to do.
Coons is really the worst that one might imagine from a county-level pol whose main objective was to create laws to allow the Billionaire Club to circumvent our land use code.
But the DE GOP didn’t need any DEM interference in this primary. They had their hands full with the Koch agenda to eradicate the moderate Castle who had *gasp* voted for the cap and trade bill.
Coons is a steadfast DLCer as most of the DE DEM Tom Carper underlings of the last few decades. He will NOT be progressive when it comes to the corporate agenda. He is a GORE, Inc. family member and on all the ‘right’ Boards with Tommy C., Governor Jack Markell (who made his millions with Nextel) and Pete duPont.