Earlier this summer, the Coalition for a Safer Detroit submitted signatures for an initiative that would have legalized possession of less than ounce of of marijuana for individuals over 21 on private property. Since the City’s Council’s Internal Operations Committee choose not to vote on it, the measure would normally go on the ballot after being reviewed by the Detroit Election Commission. This week, the Detroit Election Commission decided 3-0 to deny the citizens of Detroit their chance to vote on the initiative. From Detroit Free Press via MPP blog:
Members of the commission said they were following a recommendation by the city’s Law Department, which said the proposal was pre-empted by state law forbidding possession of the drug. Detroit attorney Matt Abel, a petition organizer, said: “This would have sent a message to the police that they should focus on more serious crime.” Abel said he and others behind the proposal were considering filing an appeal in Wayne County Circuit Court.
It is always unfortunate when some relatively obscure set of officials put a stop to direct democracy. It runs counter to the whole basis of an initiative process.



1 Comment

This is my first post to FDL and the Just Say Now Campaign, so let me begin with kudos to all those involved in the maintenance of such a cache of information. I hope people do not rush to judge me by political reference, but I find all opinions welcome if they are utilized to explore the dismantling of a serious policy gone awry–the war on drugs.
Thanks to a fellow FDL poster, I was linked to a pro-Proposition 19 website that had some video “literature.” These included several videos. One of these was an interview with the economist Milton Friedman. He might not get a warm reception in regards to his economic principles, but he gives one of the best conservative arguments to end the war on drugs I have ever heard. It seems essential to bridge the communication gap and use all forms of thought and discourse to shed light on why ending prohibition is vital to restoring some semblance of internal order to this country. Albeit, I respect that it is not the only answer–but it is one place to get something accomplished.
I would love feedback on this interview, and the response from this community to embracing the “warm, gooey center” of linking arms with conservatives to embrace a modicum of freedom. I mean, how ironic would it be to use such conservative arguments for a socially progressive movement.
–The Peacock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyystXOfDqo&feature=player_embedded#!