It appears even an “Obama official” is talking about how marijuana ballot measures might be the Democratic equivalent of gay marriage ban initiatives for Republicans. In 2004, ballot initiatives to ban gay marriage likely increased the conservative vote, helping to elect Republicans. From Joshua Green at “The Atlantic”:
[O]ne issue nobody has examined is what effect these [marijuana] initiatives have on candidates’ performance at the polls. Acting on a tip from an Obama official, I found a few Democratic consultants who have become convinced that ballot initiatives legalizing marijuana, like the one Californians will vote on in November, actually help Democrats in the same way that gay marriage bans were supposed to have helped Republicans. They are similarly popular, with medical marijuana having passed in 14 states (and the District of Columbia) where it has appeared on the ballot. In a recent poll, 56 percent of Californians said they favor the upcoming initiative to legalize and tax pot.
The issue here is demographics and voter turnout. Only a portion of all adults in the country are actually registered to vote; only a fraction of those registered will cast a ballot this November. Young adults are among the least likely to be registered to vote or to bother to show up to vote.
Among all adults and all registered voters, Democrats are actually still favored over Republicans. The problem is that Democrats are effectively tied with or losing to Republicans among the most important group: those individuals expected to vote in November.
The idea is that having marijuana on the ballot has the unique ability to fire up young adults, who tend to vote Democratic. It may spur them to register to vote and actually show up on Election Day. The more the likely voter resembles the general population, the better it is for Democrats.
California will be a huge test case to see if having marijuana legalization on the ballot can noticeably increase youth turnout. The state Democratic Party must sure be hoping legalization will fire up young adults to vote, because I don’t see gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown doing that. Especially if Brown continues his dangerously ignorant attacks on the ballot measure.
It is important to remember that despite the fact that a large segment of the country supports marijuana legalization, very few elected officials from either major party have publicly endorsed the policy. At this point, both parties still have the opportunity to grab the pro-legalization mantle. Future marijuana ballot measures could easily end up helping Republicans, if that party quickly follows the lead of former New Mexico GOP Governor Gary Johnson by endorsing cannabis legalization as a necessary outgrowth of a libertarian desire for smaller government.



26 Comments
I don’t see why Democratic office-seekers and -holders should benefit from pot initiatives; every single one of them is running as fast as they can away from the ballot measures.
GOP 2012: The Peace and Pot Party!
don’t be surprised when the worm turned against alcohol prohibition it turned really quickly.
Exactly my point. Remember how the Democrats turned against the Vietnam War once they were out of power in the White House? (And by ‘remember’ I think I mean, “haven’t you read…”)
Learn more about the campaign to legalize, control, and tax cannabis in California at http://www.taxcannabis.org. And become a fan of the campaign on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/taxcannabis. Thanks!
Because they know what a con game the whole thing is.
Gay marriage is like pot? I didn’t know the 39 years I’ve spent with my lover was akin to inhaling.
Depends on what you were inhaling. (http://www.instantrimshot.com)
putting something on the ballot to juice turnout. Doesn’t matter what.
How can you vote for what matters when “it doesn’t matter”?
FDR campaigned against alcohol prohibition. There are no Dems with the courage (or brains) to campaign against pot prohibition.
Doesn’t work with contemporary Dems. They take every defeat OR victory as an indication they need to move farther to the right.
It’s a turnout juicer, dear. Just as the Cons like putting anti-gay stuff on the ballots to ensure the Fundies turn out, some Dems realize that putting pro-weed initiatives on the ballot helps turn out young people.
Thanks to corporate media morons like David Brooks et al framing the debate.
Actually, it’s because they’re as deeply fascist as republiKKKans on most key issues, starting with EFCA, Social Security, welfare, the wars and the environment. Like the Vacuous Opportunist.
The marijuana initiatives do seem likely to help the Dems GOTV. The only problem could be that the single-issue voters could be just that, and only vote on that proposition. Not likely, but possible.
I took this as a little comic relief:
Johnson is a rare bird. I can’t imagine the Rs endorsing legalization; it would enhance the problem they already have, the split between the libertarians and the authoritarians. But it sure would be good for a laugh.
I believe he may be catering to the prison industry voters, especially as California’s Attorney General. That’s quite a demographic to lose on election day, whether he inhales or not. (;>
Probably just charmed by Brooks’ winsome smile. :)
you would be surprised how fast the worm can turn on some issues. I hear many prominent Republicans strategist are terrified about the young white vote turning hard against them over the issue.
I’ve always said Libertarians can be dealt with. They don’t like the Religious Right, they don’t like prohibition of any kind, etc, etc.
You can use this against them and use it to your advantage. Ron Paul is very anti-War mostly because he’s a isolationist, but you can use that to bring everybody home and cut the military budget.
Ron Paul doesn’t like the IRS, most of us don’t either but this is largely because the Tax Code is unfair. He would never get enough support to actually do something about that.
He was for auditing the Fed, HOW CAN YOU NOT SUPPORT THAT?
So Johnson being a true Libertarian is not the issue, its using his policy positions in your FAVOR.
I thought it was a weird analogy too. I thought the “new” meant something else taking over something that was passe, over, not relevant or hip anymore. Shows you how stupid I am.
Unless, we’re talking in Way Ethereal ideas. Like….Nothing matters. Which I don’t believe. I think everything matters. And, we have the choice to view issues through our own perviews or purviews.
Hi Cellar. Hope you and your loved one are well.
Just like Cenk just said on Dylan’s show “The Country is Center Left”
Meaning putting something like legalizing pot would do well with Democrats, young and old.
The problem is slightly that as Cenk correctly said, the reforms pushed for are not Left enough yet the Right is calling him (Obama) a Socialist, which makes NO SENSE.
So much of the Democratic base is disappointed with Obama thus far. This is what Republicans are hoping for is low turn out on the Left.
I personally don’t think it happen (low turn out).
As for Brown, he’s running for the Governorship of California. California is a Blue State, HOWEVER, its very pro POLICE and LAW ENFORCEMENT. So you have to thread that needle and Brown can’t be saying “I’m in support of legalizing Pot”. Only Retired Law Enforcement have come out in support of legalization, no currently in power AG, Police Chief or Sheriff will come out in support of such a thing, it wouldn’t look good. So even if they support it, when asked they have to be against it.
That is not the final hurdle anyway, but would-be AG’s have said they would fight it if they made it legal and of course DOJ has not said it would not enforce Federal Laws and I’m not sure if the DOJ can appear “Selective” by saying SB1070 is bad and Prop 19 is good.
No doubt the Republican strategists fear this issue. I just think they have painted themselves into a corner by allowing their party’s public face to be defined by the religious right. They created this monster and now it owns them. Just as stupid IMO but just as inevitable, given the Republicans need to motivate their base, is all the immigrant bashing and (not always) subtle racism, considering the demographic changes that are happening.
I suspect it has a lot less to do with how it looks, and a lot more to do with how much department funding is tied to the Drug War.
You never ask a cop about whether a prohibition should be repealed, his job depends on sustaining it.
as I have said here before:
smoke out
turn out
vote out
the pot ban
and while you’re at it
vote democratic
the path to a win in november.
The Dems suck so effing horribly that I’d vote for a Rethug w/ no regrets if I believed they were legitimately pro-pot.
Ew. Even if they’re still anti-equality when it comes to marriage and believing they get to control women’s uteruses? Nice.