Chris Good at the Atlantic writes about the battle between Colleen Hanabusa and Ed Case in Hawaii:
Right now, the race is close: according to a Democratic source, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has conducted an internal poll showing Case at 32%, Djou at 32%, Hanabusa at 27%, and 9% undecided.
Since nobody but Good knows who the source of this “leak” is, nobody can go back and check this highly dubious poll or its methodology. But now that he’s injected it into the discourse, it’s out there and it’s doing damage — whether someone just made it up or not.
He continues, “The DCCC is airing an ad in the race attacking Djou, but not taking sides between the Democrats.” Well, unless you count the leaking of phantom polls intended to damage Hanabusa constitutes “taking sides.”
The DCCC’s efforts to meddle in a race that Hanabusa was clearly winning is unique. Obama has historically taken a strong hand to urge challengers out of primary races against Democrats. He personally called Steve Israel and asked him not to challenge Kirsten Gillibrand for the New York Senate seat, and also helped in the effort to “clear the field” for Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania when Joe Sestak was asked to drop his primary challenge. So it’s extremely odd that he’s not intervening in the Hanbusa-Case matter to urge Case out, especially since Case’s entry into a three way race certainly risks throwing the seat to the Republican.
Ed Case is the cousin of Steve Case, the former CEO and Chairman of AOL who merged the company with Time Warner and stepped down in October of 2005. In 2006, he founded a holding company called Revolution LLC. The board of directors includes a who’s-who of “government insiders, venture capitalists, high-tech veterans” and “banished executives” including Franklin Raines, Ted Leonsis, Carlie Fiorina, Colin Powell and James L. Barksdale. (Raines made a soft landing at Revolution a week after he stepped down from the board of Fannie Mae, and went on to advise the Obama campaign on mortgage and policy matters.)
Revolution has invested in Gaiam, Zipcar, as well as Revolution Money, a competitor to PayPal. In 2007, Larry Summers served on the board of Revolution when they raised $50 million from Citi, Morgan Stanley and Deutche Bank to launch Revolution Money. Last year they announced they had raised another $42 million from Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley. In Nobember of last year, American Express announced they would buy Revolution Money for $300 million.
The White House has a very close relationship with major finance and tech companies, and Case seems to straddle both worlds. He’s been a big supporter of his cousin Ed, and he’s also a former classmate of Barack Obama at Punahou School in Hawaii (Case graduate in ’76, Obama in ’79). He’s a fierce Republican, however, so there’s no history of political loyalty, but Larry Summers’ presence on the Revolution board is probably more indicative of the dynamics at play.
While most articles on the Case-Hanabusa contratemps note what an embarrassment it would be to Obama to lose the Hawaii seat to a Republican, few explore the fact that it’s extremely unlikely that the White House has not been consulted in this matter. Or that the DCCC would most certainly not be taking this highly controversial course if Obama opposed it.
Hanabusa isn’t some flaming progressive standard bearer, but Ed Case would undoubtedly be a more “business friendly” vote in Congress — and his ties go all the way to to the top of that intricately networked world. Most people I’ve spoken to on the Hill think it’s simply a matter of an available Congressional seat, and the fact that business interests are always going to want to have a Jim Himes rather than an Alan Grayson fill it. Ed Case is the favorite in a world that Obama and the Democratic establishment see their future in servicing. And right now, the Democrats are in fierce competition with the GOP for money controlled by that world:
Last week, House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio made a pitch to Democratic contributor James Dimon, the chairman and chief executive of J.P. Morgan, over drinks at a Capitol Hill restaurant, according to people familiar with the matter.
Mr. Boehner told Mr. Dimon congressional Republicans had stood up to Mr. Obama’s efforts to curb pay and impose new regulations. The Republican leader also said he was disappointed many on Wall Street continue to donate their money to Democrats, according to the people familiar with the matter.
It’s the same battle that went on during health care. Recall the letter from Boehner to PhRMA’s Billy Tauzin, which read like a “come home, baby” letter from an abusive husband filled with remorse.
Our business overlords would rather see Case in the seat than Hanabusa. The DCCC’s willingness to float opposition research or push phantom polling against her is probably considered a small price to pay in that battle.



35 Comments
Obama is all for interfering with those who would interfere with him…Republicans or Blue Dogs winning work toward Obama’s advantage. Obama has used both for cover as we saw on HCR. Obama would rather have a Republican win (who will provide Obama cover) than a non-controlled Democrat who could actually cause a lot of trouble. If the Democrats get trounced in the midterms Obama will probably be secretly cheering. Obama is trying to win either way – have a Republican to blame win or a Democrat to control win, so if Obama costs some non-controlled Democrats races, that’s he’d consider to be a win.
Same thing with Jennifer Brunner in Ohio for their Senate seat. Obama seems determined to cement corporate rule in the Senate. And everyone already knows about Blanche Lincoln and Halter in AR. It’s good to see the unions are stepping in on the right side, though. I guess getting screwed over on both card-check and the health insurance reform finally woke them to the fact that this WH is not their friend, or even anything close to it.
Contribute to the real progressive challengers directly, people. No incumbents, no DSCC or DCCC or any other group that will give your money to the Blue Dogs, New Dems, or capitulating incumbent toadies. It’s time for a purge.
I’m so tired of Obamarahma already. Is it 2012 yet? Can we vote them out already?
It began (if not before) with Obama backing John Barrow, Blue Dog in Georgia… and I have never once seen O support a decent candidate when given a chance since.
You’re right and I don’t understand it. This constant talk about chess doesn’t explain the puzzle of what he is trying to accomplish. I have decided that Obama is not a Democrat. Seems to me to be a Republican to the bone.
Even the appearance of change is out of the question with this guy. I mean i don’t see any change beyond name in the outcome of the Lincoln Halter race… yet O endorsed Lincoln as soon as he possibly could.
As Matt Taibbi writes in RS this week, it’s not a left-right problem America has now; it’s an oligarchy problem.
That it is. I think it was Jon Walker who called David Broder an “oligarchist.” Seems to be the dominant political identity of the DC class.
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is now available: Fox News Reporter Spends Time with Tea Party Express, Concludes They’re Nuts
Obama is a Blue Dog status quo corporatist. If you look at him that way, almost everything he has done as President becomes not only comprehensible but inevitable.
Also move your money into community owned and operated banking institutions (“credit unions”). There are 93 credit unions to choose from in Hawai’i (here’s a list at http://www.creditunionsonline.com/credit-unions-hawaii.html). In making a selection, review who is on the Board, their ties and business activities, record of honest operations, etc. before moving your money there. Include review of the information at MoveYourMoney.Info , ANewWayForward.Org and ShameTheBanks.Org . Then be as active in making sure the credit union serves the community interest as you are in caring for the land. Clearly if Hawaiians do not control their financial future they won’t control their political one given the way things are. Only you and your community owned and operated credit union will care. WWLD (What Would Liliuokalani Do)?
thanks Teddy. Matt sure spells out what is wrong with the US financial system… People pay the Price and the Bank gets a slap on the wrist!! I think if a Bank has been playing these games, should they be found guilty they should Liquidated with the funds all going to the Victims and the owners get nothing.. Simply the price of wrong doing for a Corporation… After all you can’t put them in Jail can ya??
And whom shall we vote in?
Jane, should we donate to her campaign?
I know we are up against the corporations no matter what we do, but if we do nothing, we are really lost, IMO.
For the sane, complete and utter social isolation (IMax) of the individual is better as it makes it really hard for them to repeat the crime from prison and with the added benefit of getting every opportunity to review what they’ve done wrong. In some countries, if the family did not take an interest in the rehabilitation of the individual including supporting their life with at least food and water, well, the prisoner stayed there without state support and died of natural means (old age, sickness and death as natural processes ; not execution). So, you might imagine that the motivation to change is huge. Of course this means the collective does not tolerate corrupt leadership and the prison of this sort that is integrated with the community, under proper community oversight and management. This is not what we have now. Instead, leaders and prisons are unaccountable, “Black box” operations warehousing human beings and systematically breeding other social ills all for the profit of a hand full of individuals– predator state and shock doctrine capitalism at their worst.
Oligarchy.
I’ve always referred to “the plutocracy” which indicates the rich elites at the center of political and economic power in the US, however, the term “oligarchy” encompasses plutocracy sufficiently for me. Call a rose a rose or a thorn a thorn if that is what pokes your hand. Oligarchy.
The US is a market-capitalist society with drastically insufficient restraint on the power of the rich minority, and is politically a representative democracy in which representatives are chosen by an oligarchy which retains power through financial and economic leverage. The power of the oligarchy grows as the economic imbalances continue to favor the rich minority more and more.
I find “oil-i-garchy” a fitting play on words.
Case AOL WTF the Dems are aware how AOL’s inflated Stock deflated and lost Time Warner investor’s mllions these guys should be radioactive whats next Ken Lay’s cousin will run as a Dem?
Actually, “plutarchy” may be correct.
I don’t believe much in the value of semantics in swaying broad opinion, its hopeless really. Most people wouldn’t care about the difference between oligarchy and plutarchy, most wouldn’t know what either term means. Nonetheless, I feel better seeing on this web site that am I not the only person noticing that there is real big break taking place between the more integrated socioeconomic strata of the post-WWII decades and the hyper-rich/crumbling middle class status quo of today.
Punctuation challenged?
Thank God I have a kid with ADHD and Tourette’s or this would have been difficult to read!! *g*
We’ll get you your prize right away, Seymour.
What would you like, the punch bowl or trophy thingee?
Presumably you have a point to make besides simply making asshole comments at people? If you do, by all means share it.
You are a 100% correct
The Dumbing down of the USA has been a huge success.
War in Iraq is for Oil (american elites with their MSM, says it is about weapons of mass destruction)
War in Afghan is for an Oil Pipeline (american elites with their “MSM”, says it is about Bin Laden)
Barack Obama governs like a Reagan Republican (american elites with their “MSM” tricks the masses by calling him a progressive)
Barack Obama Health Care Bill = Republican Mitt Rommney Health Care Bill (american elites with the help of phony groups like Daily Kos, Move On, tell the world this is a liberal Bill)
This was the Rahm strategery in the 1990s. They are birds of a feather, Rahm & Obama. They want to be members of the exclusive club, at least vicariously. They feel that life is too short to worry about the societal damage they are reeking and all the concomitant matters that follow.
It reeks, all right. But I believe that they are wreaking it.
Great tune that ought to go viral– The Hedge Fund Song: Betting Against the American Dream (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/12/a-hedge-fund-show-tune-ma_n_534024.html).
No, you hit the nail on the head. I like folks who use their lips to blow their own trumpets.
Very good question. I was wondering the same thing when I first saw this post this afternoon.
The DCCC and the DSCC keep making their promises when asking people for money, but don’t bother to tell potential contributors that the money will be used to support candidates who will work for corporate America even against the interests of the American people.
Hanabusa’s campaign sent an email blast out today, directing folks to a Honolulu Advertiser unscientific poll, urging folks to vote for her. The results as of 1:30pm Hawaii time on Monday, shows 8828 votes divided 23.8% for Case, 28% for Djou, and 39% for Hanabusa, with 9.2% undecided. I don’t have any idea how much Hanabusa’s email request for supporters to go vote in the poll may have affected her numbers, but at least this is a good poll for her to use to counter the DCCC’s supposed poll.
Those who oppose what DCCC is doing in this election should be bombing DCCC’s switchboards, fax, etc. with protests for insulting Hawaii’s voters by interfering with the election in the first place and then adding injury to insult by betting on the worse candidate, both electorally and in terms of public policy. (But then, again, we know that they know what’s best for us, so we DFH should STFU.)
The problem is if you are not on Oahu [Honolulu], there are far fewer CU’s, and almost all require that you be a state, federal or local employee to join.
Amen to that. How much worse could a Palin presidency be? Four years of what we have now, more laughs (even if through tears), and someone to blame in 2016?
On the bright side, it seems to me that this is the beginning of the phase where the DCCC starts eating its young. In as much as this Hanabusa is the favorite of all of the incumbents in her state, I very much doubt that she is very far from the corporatist mold. Yet, as soon as a big-donor bankster guy’s brother comes along, the machine turns on her. Let’s hope this makes some apparatchniks suddenly nervous.
Ms Hanabusa has impressed me greatly over the years, both in terms of background (plantation labor union parents) and nuts&bolts competence as State Senate Majority Leader. Her appearances on local TV have been wonkfests of describing in loving detail how the legislative sausage is made. The State Senate under Hanabusa’s leadership has overridden dozens of Gov. Lingle’s vetoes. My money’s on Hanabusa to win, Case to place, Djou, “who him?”
I’m a Hanabusa supporter and a Hawaii resident, but there are some serious factual problems with this article. Hanabusa has NEVER been “clearly winning” this race. She’s been behind the whole time, far behind. To suggest otherwise is to blow all credibility. Where on earth did Hamsher pull that from? Moreover, she calls into question the credibility of the DCCC poll, but I just got an email from Hanabusa touting the poll. Clearly Hanabusa’s own internals aren’t that far off from this DCCC poll. Noticeably thin on actual facts is Hamsher’s claim that Obama somehow was involved or greenlighted the DCCC in this regard. Weird. Anyway, I’ve written a diary on dKos, fully sourced, about this race for people who are interested, focusing more on the prospect of a Republican win than on the DCCC angle.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/4/13/856655/-HI-01-Why-the-bluest-state-in-the-country-may-send-a-Republican-to-Congress
As Bill Maher says, “If you have a war for oil, at least get some G** D***
oil!”
We all know that Inouye’s “gal” is receiving his support only because Inouye will do anything to stop Case. Is that real support? Ed has never had a TV spot pulled because it was misleading. Case beat her before and he’ll beat here again. Imua!